Search for: "People v Challenger" Results 461 - 480 of 18,774
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2024, 1:49 am by Tessa Shepperson
That means empowering tenants to challenge rogue and criminal landlords whilst ensuring the confidence of responsible landlords to stay in the market. [read post]
23 May 2024, 5:27 am by Jacob Ford Ridgeway
Adding to these challenges is the adoption by the Supreme Court of the “Major Questions Doctrine” in the 2022 case West Virginia v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
As one Court watcher wrote:Although none of the parties challenged Abood, in his majority opinion, Alito broadcast his desire to overrule that 40-year-old decision. [read post]
21 May 2024, 8:17 am by Phil Dixon
An eyewitness reported that one of the people involved was a dreadlocked Black man. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:40 am by David Pozen
By contrast, Paul-Emile’s theory might suggest a revisionist reading of Gonzales v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 7:24 am by Tom Dannenbaum
We can expect this to be challenged in upcoming proceedings, but, with a large and growing majority of UN member states recognizing Palestinian statehood, that challenge is unlikely to succeed. [read post]
19 May 2024, 10:13 pm by INFORRM
The four Claimants included asylum seekers and survivors of trafficking and were challenging the UK Home Office’s policy of placing people released from immigration detention under 24/7 GPS surveillance, either by shackling them with “fitted” (i.e. irremovable) ankle tags or by requiring them to carry “non-fitted” GPS-enabled devices. [read post]
18 May 2024, 2:48 pm by Larry
The basis for this decision is explained in Cyber Power Systems (USA) Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 9:05 pm by Tyler Hoguet
Schweber and Anderson explain that under the test established in Brandenburg v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 1:07 pm by John Ross
This week the Tenth Circuit vacates that opinion and requests supplemental briefing on how the Supreme Court's recent decision in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. [read post]