Search for: "People v Smith (William)" Results 461 - 480 of 583
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2010, 4:48 am by charonqc
R (Smith) v Secretary of State for Defence & Anor [2010] UKSC 29 JUDGMENT The Supreme Court allowed the appeal on the jurisdiction issue (Lady Hale, Lord Mance and Lord Kerr dissenting) and unanimously dismissed the appeal on the inquest issue. [read post]
31 May 2010, 11:57 am by law shucks
Major firms have laid off 6 people this month (all lawyers) 491 people this year (192 lawyers, 299 staff) 14,702 people si [read post]
5 May 2010, 7:13 pm by Rick
The Federalist Papers, No. 46, at p. 296 (James Madison) (Clinton Rossiter, ed., Signet Classic 2003).Thomas Jefferson, letter to William Stephens Smith, November 13, 1787. [read post]
5 May 2010, 5:06 am by Susan Brenner
B.J.F., 491 U.S. 524 (1989) and Smith v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am by Tom Goldstein
Supreme Court retirements inevitably produce much more coverage of process than substance. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm by admin
Downtown News Online, March 26, 2010 Operators of the Downtown Standard hotel have pleaded guilty to violating federal environmental law following a Jan. 18 incident that caused a street closure and sickened several people in a subway station. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 3:37 am
Eriq Gardner at THR, Esq. has the story, as does Ray Beckerman at Recording Industry v. the People. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am by Hilde
Stevens is a generation or two removed from most of his colleagues; when Roberts served as a law clerk to William H. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 12:31 am
This approach was on display during the dense and complex arguments in Samantar v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am by Editor
As she puts it in her bio, "I care very much about information technology and how it affects people's lives, but I'm concerned that legal policies and precedents are being very foolishly decided that are ultimately detrimental to society. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am by Editor
As she puts it in her bio, "I care very much about information technology and how it affects people's lives, but I'm concerned that legal policies and precedents are being very foolishly decided that are ultimately detrimental to society. [read post]