Search for: "People v. Bruce"
Results 461 - 480
of 934
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2014, 7:34 am
The defendants say that the Diocese and its parishes all forfeited their property when the Diocese voted to amend its governing documents so as to make it no longer a constituent member of ECUSA.According to the official line promulgated by ECUSA, "people may leave, but dioceses may not. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 3:06 am
Secretary of State and the People’s Republic of China State Councilor. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 4:00 am
We the People, Volume 3: The Civil Rights Revolution. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 12:00 pm
The anniversaries of Brown v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 10:23 am
(Photo by Bruce Bennett Studios/Getty Images) From Allianz Suisse Versicherungs-Gesellschaft v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 7:49 am
Prince v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 1:55 pm
” In that post I introduced Bruce‘s observation that “people are sticking legislation into GitHub at a furious pace. [read post]
20 May 2014, 6:08 am
For the Symposium on Bruce Ackerman, We The People, Volume Three: The Civil Rights RevolutionThe Symposium raises two large themes, with many variations. [read post]
5 May 2014, 12:12 pm
We the People adopted constitutional changes outside of the procedure stipulated in Article V. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm
For the Symposium on Bruce Ackerman, We The People, Volume Three: The Civil Rights Revolution Florence RoismanI’ve already expressed my views on the housing discussion in The Civil Rights Revolution (TCRR). [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm
For the Symposium on Bruce Ackerman, We The People, Volume Three: The Civil Rights Revolution Florence RoismanI’ve already expressed my views on the housing discussion in The Civil Rights Revolution (TCRR). [read post]
2 May 2014, 11:26 am
For the Symposium on Bruce Ackerman, We the People, Volume Three: The Civil Rights RevolutionJamal GreeneBruce Ackerman’s We the People series is self-consciously about canon formation. [read post]
2 May 2014, 8:19 am
John McGinnis Bruce Ackerman’s We The People, Volume 3: The Civil Rights Revolution is a beautifully written book full of historical interest. [read post]
1 May 2014, 5:00 am
Bruce Ackerman introduced the basic elements of his theory of constitutional moments in the Storrs lectures in the late 1980s. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 6:31 pm
In Hills v. [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 10:16 am
The long-awaited third volume of Bruce Ackerman’s We The People series is both a response to and a captive of Herbert Wechsler’s canonical article on Toward Neutral Principles in Constitutional Law. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 7:05 am
In my previous post, I was pleased to present Bruce Ackerman’s reply to my paper, We the People: Each and Every One, which is a portion of his reply to critics that will appear in the Yale Law Journal. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 6:59 am
Professor Barnett builds his radically individualistic view of popular sovereignty on Chisholm v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 7:32 pm
As many who follow such things know, ABC v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 7:37 am
Bruce MacDonald. [read post]
