Search for: "People v. Novel"
Results 461 - 480
of 1,820
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2011, 8:38 pm
By Daniel RichardsonRBS Citizens, N.A. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 1:35 pm
Most people today prefer to spend their lives gathering more and more information. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 12:51 pm
I've been prepping up the Supreme Court's opinion in Stern v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 6:40 pm
Put another way, this is an effort by the Obama administration to show it does not need to put people into a regime of long-term military detention in order to ensure that alleged terrorists are adequately mined for whatever intelligence value they might have. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 10:04 am
By Eric Goldman Goforit Entertainment LLC v. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
After reading Bush v. [read post]
11 Nov 2006, 7:15 am
The appeal case is Wallace v IBM, Red Hat and Novell, in which one Mr Daniel Wallace claimed that he would like to compete against the Linux operating system by selling derivatives or writing an operating system from scratch, but that this was not possible because Linux is offered for free. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 10:07 am
After that hearing, at which scientific literature was introduced and doctors for both the planitiffs and defendants testified, Justice Mayer ruled that plaintiffs would not be allowed to offer expert testimony at trial in support of their MCS claims:In New York, evidence based on novel scientific theories or techniques is considered admissible only upon a showing of general acceptance within the relevant scientific community (People v Carrieri, 49 AD3d 660, 854 NYS2d 427… [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 5:58 am
People v. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 4:52 am
See RIM v. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 4:52 am
See RIM v. [read post]
6 Jan 2025, 12:13 pm
See, e.g., Kuklinski v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 9:11 am
Evidence offered for marriage was enough to require reversal of summary judgment, appellate panel concludes, and passes on opportunity to apply the novel sham affidavit rule created by the Texas Supreme Court in Lujan v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 2:51 pm
Likewise, his blistering dissent in Obergefell v. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 8:14 am
Novel or added voting opportunities can add cost or complexity to the system. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 8:00 am
James v. [read post]
18 Nov 2024, 8:37 pm
” This seems like a reasonable goal, as most people can probably agree that America is not healthy. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 3:09 pm
The novel coronavirus continues to spread across the United States. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 3:47 am
The other notable case last week was Arizona Free Enterprise PAC v. [read post]
7 May 2016, 4:10 pm
In V v Associated Newspapers [2016] EWCOP 21, published on 25 April, Mr Justice Charles, Deputy President and Judge in Charge of the Court of Protection, uses the word ‘prurient’ several times about the press coverage of earlier judgments in the case of ‘C’, the woman who ‘lost her sparkle’. [read post]
