Search for: "Poole v. United States" Results 461 - 480 of 1,426
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2017, 3:19 pm by Larry
For purposes of Sigvaris, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 5:10 pm by Law Lady
GARLAND GEORGE CURTIS, Defendant-Appellant. 11th Circuit.Criminal law -- Sentencing -- Unopposed motion for continuance of resentencing hearing pending review in United States Supreme Court of decision of United States Court of Appeals which obligates trial court to impose 30-year sentence rather than 17-and-a-half-year sentence initially imposed for offense of production of child pornography for transportation into this country -- Motion granted -- Response to… [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 11:42 pm by Florian Mueller
Gilstrap of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas has entered an order that resolves multiple motions brought by Apple and Ericsson. [read post]
6 May 2020, 12:12 pm by Peter Margulies
§ 1182(f), which empowers the president to bar entry of foreign nationals who would be "detrimental to the interests of the United States. [read post]
31 May 2016, 10:59 am by Amanda Pickens
May 25, 2016) (purported collective and class action brought under the FLSA and state wage and hour laws for an improper “tip pool”). [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 3:37 pm by Prof. Coplan, Karl S.
Those who have been involved in the environmentalist side of nuclear power issues in the United States have long been arguing that existing reactor and spent fuel management could not be relied on to prevent the sort of cascade of failures now in progress at the Fukushima Daiichi plant. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
“Foreign person” means anyone that is not a United States citizen, national, or lawful permanent resident; any individual admitted to the United States as a refugee under 8 U.S.C. 1157 or granted asylum under 8 U.S.C. 1158; any entity organized solely under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign branches); or any person in the United States. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 1:34 am
The United States Supreme Court has expressly ruled that the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination only extends to testimonial or communicative evidence. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 3:13 am
Higbee Co., 319 F.3d 825, 829 (6th Cir.2003) (en banc) (quoting United States v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 11:59 am by JB
What Congress may not do under the Commerce Clause is explained in United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 10:41 am by Peter Margulies
§ 1182(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), which authorizes the president to bar entry of foreign nationals “detrimental to the interests of the United States”—the same provision that Trump used for his travel ban, which the Supreme Court upheld in Trump v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 10:25 am by Scott R. Anderson, Megan Reiss
This is decidedly not the case, however, when it comes to the United States’s own use of nuclear weapons. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 7:36 am by Victoria VanBuren
Any hearing will take place in the United States before the AAA using the AAA Supplementary Procedures. [read post]