Search for: "Refuse Materials, Inc." Results 461 - 480 of 3,479
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2021, 7:32 am by John Elwood
Scott, 20-257Issue: Whether a district court may consider factors other than the presence of a single material question of law or fact common to a group of employees when assessing whether the employees are “similarly situated” for purposes of the collective-action provision of the Fair Labor Standards Act. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
It is only a revival of the old principle that, when a publisher is constantly redistributing material to the public, and the material is in its aggregate libelous (even if by omission), the publisher can be held liable for defamation. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 5:41 pm by INFORRM
Gupta filed a defamation suit against Herdsceneand arguing that his reputation had been damaged due to the allegations in the post and, as a result, art galleries were refusing to display his artworks. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 6:56 am by Melissa E. Scott
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“TTAB”) issued a precedential decision affirming refusal of SolarWindow Technologies, Inc. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 5:10 am by Eric Barton
Notwithstanding these findings, however, Judge Davis refused to strike the entire Non-Solicit, as requested by Mr. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 8:18 am by Silver Law Group
December 21, 2020: A regulatory disclosure states that Michael Shillin was indefinitely barred in all capacities for refusing to produce information or documents or give testimony requested by FINRA. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 9:40 am by Josh H. Escovedo and Zack Thompson
Supreme Court issued numerous landmark decisions in 2020, among those—for trademark scholars and practitioners—Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 12:38 am by CMS
KBR UK produced various documents, but indicated that other material, if it existed, would be held by KBR, Inc in the United States. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 11:04 am by Eugene Volokh
Supreme Court has refused to create any media-nonmedia distinction, both in libel cases and in First Amendment cases. [read post]