Search for: "Richards v. Johnson*" Results 461 - 480 of 829
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2024, 7:10 am by INFORRM
On Tuesday 30 July 2024 there was a statement in open court in the case of Singh v Cartland and a return date hearing the case of Synnovis Services v Persons Unknown. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:11 am by Jeh Johnson
Editor's Note: This post contains the text of a speech that former Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson delivered on Feb. 6 at the American Constitution Society (ACS) Symposium at the Georgetown University Law Center. *** I am happy to be part of this symposium. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 10:45 am by Susan Brenner
Pandelos and three other `victims’, David Cotton, Mitchell Bender and Richard Smith, testified. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 8:00 am
The Patent Reform Act of 2007 (PRA)Via the University of Chicago Law School Faculty Blog we are directed to Richard Epstein's column at the Financial Times (FT.com) website which views the Patent Reform Act of 2007 (PRA) as A dangerous one-two punch, arguing that changes to rules on patent-based injunctions and patent infringement damages would dampen patent innovation.As far as injunctions are concerned, Epstein points to the standard voiced by the US Supreme Court holding in eBay… [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am by INFORRM
According to the Guardian, former Daily Star reporter Richard Peppiatt was one half of the pantomime horse greeting Brooks at the RCJ. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
On the same day, Fancourt J heard two applications in Duke of Sussex v NGN. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am by Bruce Ackerman
As Graber notes, my political account ends with the resignation of Richard Nixon, and a lot has gone on since then. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 1:30 am by INFORRM
Journalism and regulation There are no newly adjudicated cases to report but several resolved cases: Peter Reynolds v Daily Mail (Clause 1, 27/04/2012); A man v Huddersfield Daily Examiner (Clause 1, 27/04/2012); Mr Smith on behalf of Gaoh Energy Ltd v Tamworth Herald (Clause 1, 27/04/2012); Mr Patrick McCadden v Sunday Mail (Clause 1, 27/04/2012); A woman v North Devon Journal (Clause 1, 3, 27/04/2012); A woman v Western Daily Press (Clause 5,… [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 1:11 am by INFORRM
 On 1 and 2 November 2023, the UK Supreme court (Lords Reed, Sales, Hamblen, Burrows and Richards) heard the appeal in the case of Mueen-Uddin v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 11:59 am by Alex Potcovaru
The Supreme Court released a major ruling this week in Ziglar v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 5:19 am by Mark Graber
  Alvis, Bailey and Taylor note some minor legal differences between the defenses of congressional delegation theory advanced by Justice Louis Brandeis and James McReynolds in Myers v. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 12:41 pm by Annsley Merelle Ward
Sir Richard Arnold, Lord Justice of AppealFees:  Fees are charged for this event from £8 - £35. [read post]
25 Jul 2015, 9:20 am by Quinta Jurecic
Gordon Adams and Richard Sokolsky provided Part 2 of their Foreign Policy Essay on U.S. assistance to foreign security sectors. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 7:22 pm by Smita Ghosh
In the LA Review of Books, Amy Brady reviews Richard Kluger’s, Indelible Ink: The Trials of John Peter Zenger and the Birth of America’s Free Press, which “tells the complex and thoroughly engaging history leading up to and including the moment of Zenger’s trial for seditious libel of a government figure,” and Stephen Rhode reviews two new books on the death penalty, Courting Death: The Supreme Court and Capital Punishment (which provides “a clear and… [read post]