Search for: "Roberts v. United States"
Results 461 - 480
of 9,614
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2023, 4:35 pm
Bellotti (1978), set the legal-ideological stage for SCOTUS’s landmark decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 1:10 pm
[7] Citizens United v. [read post]
29 May 2023, 7:15 am
As of May 17, 2023 the case was still pending.[2] Roberts and Edwards were both raised in the southern United States and their artwork explores Black identity through collage. [read post]
26 May 2023, 12:20 pm
See Robert v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 10:56 am
On May 18, 2023, the United States Supreme Court ruled in favor of famed rock photographer Lynn Goldsmith against the Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. [read post]
26 May 2023, 10:54 am
Under the Clean Water Act, these agencies have dual regulatory authority to protect “waters of the United States” and “adjacent wetlands. [read post]
26 May 2023, 6:15 am
The law also specifically bars any Chinese foreign principals from purchasing any real estate whatsoever in the state, with limited exceptions for residential property by those lawfully present in the United States. [read post]
25 May 2023, 9:03 pm
Joining Alito were Justices Roberts, Thomas, Gorsuch and Barrett. [read post]
25 May 2023, 11:19 am
Phillips v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 8:40 am
” The CWA defines navigable waters as “waters of the United States. [read post]
24 May 2023, 8:00 am
United States, No. 3:22-cv-00181 (E.D. [read post]
23 May 2023, 7:00 am
In Sipko v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 3:52 pm
§ 1391(e)(1)(C) because the United States, one or more of its agencies, and one of its officers in his official capacity are Defendants, and Plaintiffs Joshua Roberts, Deborah Lawson, Laura Brunstetter, Julia Badger, Patrick Mendoza York, Patrick Wright, and Jana Spruce reside in this District, and no real property is involved. [read post]
22 May 2023, 4:30 am
Here is the abstract: The United States, it is widely believed, is at a moment of constitutional crisis. [read post]
21 May 2023, 9:00 pm
The most straightforward way to understand his thinking is apparently that the pendency of the inevitable lawsuits would so roil the financial markets that the economy would be damaged in the meantime—AND that doing so would be worse than the alternatives.Again, he is right that there would be a political crisis, and the days, weeks, or months that the world would spend waiting for a resolution would make the 2000 Bush v. [read post]
18 May 2023, 5:14 am
” In United States v. [read post]
17 May 2023, 9:32 am
And in future cases, Justice Clarence Thomas emphasized, courts should uphold gun restrictions only if there is a tradition of such regulation in United States history. [read post]
17 May 2023, 4:30 am
Phelps in 2011, United States v. [read post]
16 May 2023, 4:00 am
We affirm the three-judge panel’s Harper v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 6:15 am
Raich (2005) (Thomas, J., dissenting) (internal quotation marks omitted); see also United States v. [read post]
