Search for: "Rowe v. United States"
Results 461 - 480
of 1,393
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2018, 4:11 am
United States, in which the justices will consider whether a provision of the federal sex-offender act violates the nondelegation doctrine. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 7:54 am
§105, as a “work of the United States Government”? [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 7:21 am
Englert gave part of his argument time to Gregory Garre of the United States Solicitor General's office, which filed a friend-of-the-court brief in support of the state of Kentucky. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 12:07 pm
As Professors Elizabeth Rowe and Daniel Mahfood at University of Florida explained in their pre-DTSA article, there were two main challenges when it came to using state trade secret law to reach out-of-state conduct. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 12:32 pm
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (Board) confirmed claims 1–14 of the ’680 patent. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 12:07 pm
As Professors Elizabeth Rowe and Daniel Mahfood explained in their pre-DTSA article, there were two main challenges when it came to using state trade secret law to reach out-of-state conduct. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 3:24 am
” At Slate, Judith Schaeffer looks back at comments about Loving v. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 4:27 am
But in a January ruling, Judge Keith Ellison of United States District Court lamented that even though he was concerned Mr. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 2:29 pm
The act also requires employees to verify that they are eligible to work in the United States by submitting a Form I-9, and it strictly limits the use of information on or attached to a Form I-9. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 7:59 am
” At The Originalism Blog, Chris Green discusses whether the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group has standing to defend the Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 5:58 am
Washington State Dept. of Licensing v. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 5:04 am
In Escobar v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 9:30 am
A few months later the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Furman v. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 8:32 pm
In it, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit highlights differences in the construction of the act by several courts with regard to various types of positions often filled by local hires. -- Clemens Kochinke, Berliner, Corcoran & Rowe, LLP, Washington. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 2:15 pm
” Thus, Urbanski stressed, the only question a federal habeas court should ask is whether that determination “was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 7:58 am
Supreme Court's 2008 ruling in Baze v. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 3:14 am
Does the Eighth Amendment to the United StatesConstitution prohibit means for carrying out a methodof execution that create an unnecessary risk of painand suffering as opposed to only a substantial risk ofthe wanton infliction of pain? [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 1:45 am
" Bloate v. [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 5:04 am
As the Supreme Court said in United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 5:17 am
United States, in which the Court will consider whether a defendant returns “any part” of a fraudulent loan when he gives the lenders the collateral that secures the money. [read post]
