Search for: "SELLERS v. SELLERS" Results 461 - 480 of 5,569
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2019, 7:00 am by Buckingham
  Most states have modeled their law after the South Dakota law analyzed in South Dakota v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 11:32 am by Daithí
Jacobsen v Katzer, now settled), or the EULA issues raised in MDY v Blizzard and the issues highlighted through Amazon’s Orwellian mess. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 10:01 am
This is the situation that occurred in the Second Department's decision in Novelty Crystal Corp. v PSA Institutional Partners, L.P., 2008 NY Slip Op 00242 decided on January 15th. [read post]
9 Oct 2024, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
However, the parties to a merger agreement may agree to depart from the default rule, and a recent Morris James blog highlights the Delaware Superior Court’s decision in Biomerieux v. [read post]
16 May 2023, 3:00 am by Meredith Ervine
In the wake of such a post-acquisition regulatory development, the opinion in LPPAS Representative, LLC v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 9:02 am
The control that Tien Tsin was able to exercise because of trademark ownership, stock ownership, and near sole supplier status did not rise to the level of total domination that could justify holding it liable for torts committed by a separately incorporated entity, the court concluded.The decision is Campagnolo S.R.L. v. [read post]