Search for: "SELLERS v. STATE"
Results 461 - 480
of 3,983
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2010, 2:50 pm
Hansen In Holmes v. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 12:05 pm
Co. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 8:31 am
On 24 February 2023, the Dutch Supreme court has ruled in the case Willemen Infra v Jura, ECLI:NL:HR:2023:313. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 12:02 pm
The notice must state that any holder of the contract is subject to all claims and defenses the consumer could assert against the seller of the financed goods or services, and that the consumer’s “recovery [under the contract] shall not exceed amounts paid by the debtor [under the contract]. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 4:51 pm
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] Englert v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 1:00 pm
The recent judgment of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom in Cavendish Square Holding BV v Talal El Makdessi is a must-read for anyone involved in contract law. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 6:21 pm
Purchasers can reduce the impact of these qualifiers by including an indemnification provision that expressly states that these materiality qualifiers do not apply for the purpose of indemnification. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 9:27 pm
Hanson v. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 5:11 am
State v. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 12:08 pm
Indeed, a very similar issue came up in City of New York v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 11:42 am
” The plaintiffs go on to note that all fixed annuities — including FIAs — had previously been treated as insurance products, exempt from federal securities laws and regulated under state insurance laws. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 10:49 am
The Supreme Court's 1992 ruling in Quill V. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 6:14 pm
Ex B: the spate of silly state laws restricting the gaming of online ticket sellers' algorithms, such as the Minnesota law. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 5:16 am
(quoting Marchant v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 12:08 pm
For example in the opinion of Abry Partners V, L.P. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 2:34 pm
For example, in Syvrud v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 4:07 am
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 9:18 am
Kam Lee Yuen Trading Co. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 5:50 am
Innovation Ventures, LLC v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 8:24 am
Facebook opinion (the court praises that dissent as “influential”–though surely not more influential in California state courts than Barrett v. [read post]
