Search for: "STEVENS v. PAGE" Results 461 - 480 of 1,395
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2014, 4:36 am by SHG
She is not sick,” [Hickox attorney Steven] Hyman said. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 12:25 pm
 Back in 1993, when I clerked for Justice Ginsburg, the Court decided the case of Ratzlaf v. [read post]
—PART V— Not all Native Advertising May Be Commercial Speech under the First Amendment If there is one thing clear from the case law, it is that the commercial speech analysis under the First Amendment is a fact intensive one that does not clearly lend itself to bright lines, especially when dealing with mixed commercial and noncommercial speech. [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 5:11 pm by INFORRM
In the significant New Zealand Court of Appeal decision in Murray v Wishart ([2014] NZCA 461) the judges unanimously ruled that a third party publisher (the owner of a Facebook page that contained comments by others) was not liable for other people’s comments simply because he “ought to have known” that they contain defamatory material (even if he didn’t actually know of the content of the comments). [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 8:13 pm by Schachtman
Steven Zimmet provides the catechistic testimony, based upon the Mt. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 7:44 am by Ronald Collins
 Cite checkers at the Court evidently determined the correct page numbers. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am by Schachtman
  With fear and trembling, and sometimes sickness not quite unto death, federal and state judges, and lawyers on both sides of the “v,” must now do more than attack, defend, and evaluate expert witnesses on simplistic surrogates for the truth, such as personal bias or qualifications. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 9:08 pm by Alfred Brophy
I've been meaning to talk for a while about Steven J. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 2:25 pm by Howard Knopf
Stevens where, as noted, each unauthorized reproduction was found to be a violation of the copyright holder’s rights. [read post]