Search for: "Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog"
Results 461 - 480
of 1,474
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2017, 4:11 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 2:02 pm
While the state’s effort to enforce publicity rights is puzzling on many fronts–including the fact that Section 230 can apply to publicity rights claims in the Ninth Circuit–the court doesn’t really engage with the publicity rights underpinning at all. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 4:43 pm
As a matter of civil procedure, I think Google is right to say that a Preliminary Injunction like this would never have issued from a US court. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 9:57 am
As a matter of civil procedure, I think Google is right to say that a Preliminary Injunction like this would never have issued from a US court. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 8:15 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit arguing that federal civil rights laws do not protect individuals from discrimination based on their sexual orientation or gender identity. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 3:30 am
The three-judge panel denied Zarda’s claim in April 2017, but held that Zarda would be entitled to a new trial if the full Second Circuit agreed with his arguments about Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 3:17 am
The Trump team volunteered to submit its new Title VII brief in the Second Circuit Court case (Zarda v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 5:00 pm
In 2010, the defendant operated on the plaintiff to correct pain in her right foot by placing a screw near her second toe. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 3:30 am
That issue is at the intersection of three phases in the modern civil rights revolution: on women’s rights, gay rights, and transgender rights. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 7:14 am
Colorado Civil Rights Commission, which is about if a state can constitutionally enforce its civil rights law against a bakery whose owner refused, for religious reasons, to make a cake for a same-sex couple’s wedding party. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 5:40 pm
Wisconsin: This important property-rights case was filed by four siblings who received two adjoining lots on a river in Wisconsin from their parents, who had bought one lot and built a home on it and then purchased the second lot as an investment. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 5:12 am
Wisconsin: This important property-rights case was filed by four siblings who received two adjoining lots on a river in Wisconsin from their parents, who had bought one lot and built a home on it and then purchased the second lot as an investment. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 8:47 am
Colorado Civil Rights Commission 16-111 Issue: Whether applying Colorado’s public accommodations law to compel the petitioner to create expression that violates his sincerely held religious beliefs about marriage violates the free speech or free exercise clauses of the First Amendment. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 7:59 am
Colorado Civil Rights Commission, 16-111 Issue: Whether applying Colorado’s public accommodations law to compel the petitioner to create expression that violates his sincerely held religious beliefs about marriage violates the free speech or free exercise clause of the First Amendment. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:50 am
Although courts of appeal are split on the issue, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals (which covers New York, Connecticut, and Vermont) has previously held that class action waivers do not violate the NLRA. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:50 am
Although courts of appeal are split on the issue, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals (which covers New York, Connecticut, and Vermont) has previously held that class action waivers do not violate the NLRA. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 9:00 am
As many activists who lived through the civil rights era, or protested in the streets just this past year, could tell you: Restrictions on free speech are often applied most stringently against groups trying to challenge the status quo. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:04 am
Colorado Civil Rights Commission, 16-111, now on its unlucky 13th relist. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 6:50 am
Colorado Civil Rights Commission 16-111 Issue: Whether applying Colorado’s public accommodations law to compel the petitioner to create expression that violates his sincerely held religious beliefs about marriage violates the free speech or free exercise clauses of the First Amendment. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 4:45 am
” At the Human Rights at Home blog, Martha Davis notes that “[i]mportantly for US human rights activists, the opinion took human rights law seriously. [read post]
