Search for: "Spencer v. Spencer"
Results 461 - 480
of 1,270
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2011, 12:52 pm
” Spencer v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 6:19 am
Yesterday's oral arguments before the Supreme Court in the direct appeal case of Roy Lee Ward v. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 12:20 pm
The FTC v. [read post]
24 Nov 2017, 8:37 am
Despite a period of uncertainty, the Supreme Court clarified the law in Marks and Spencer plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Limited [2015] UKSC 72, confirming that the traditional strict tests still represent the law. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 11:14 am
’” Spencer v. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 2:34 am
The Court held that the judge at first instance had not properly applied the legal test for the implication of contractual terms, as established in Marks & Spencer Plc v. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 2:00 am
Speakers include Candace Spencer, Meridian Institute; Jami Coleman, Williams & Coleman, P.A.; Shunta V. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 10:59 am
Spencer, 2013 U.S. [read post]
13 Nov 2006, 10:58 pm
In Lochner v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 7:16 am
Spencer, Seventh Circuit: The Seventh Circuit vacated Appellant's sentence because the district court improperly included a sentencing enhancement. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 12:52 pm
In King v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 6:26 am
That case is Glasser & Glasser v Jack Bays, Inc et al. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 11:58 am
Kel Partners, and Spencer v. [read post]
29 Dec 2007, 8:46 am
State v. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 5:01 am
In Sines v. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 1:32 am
High Court (Chancery Division) Parti v Aysha Hamad Nassir Sabah Al-Nassir Al Sabah & Ors [2007] EWHC 1869 (Ch) (31 July 2007) Tomy UK Ltd v HM Revenue & Customs [2007] EWHC 1889 (Ch) (31 July 2007) Vellacott v The Convergence Group Plc & Ors [2007] EWHC 1774 (Ch) (31 July 2007) Albon (t/a NA Carriage Co) v Naza Motor Trading Sdn Bhd & Anor (No 4) [2007] EWHC 1879 (Ch) (31 July 2007) Walker v Inter-Alliance Group Plc… [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 7:05 am
New Hampshire and Gonzalez v. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 5:18 pm
Spencer Gifts, Inc., No. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 3:51 am
Furthermore, while CPLR 306-b permits a court, in the exercise of its discretion, to [*2]extend the time to serve process upon good cause shown or in the interest of justice (see Leader v Maroney, Ponzini & Spencer, 97 NY2d 95, 101), the plaintiffs did not move for, or otherwise request, an extension in the Supreme Court (see Lehman v North Greenwich Landscaping, LLC, 65 AD3d 1293, 1295; Matter of Saltzman v Board of Appeals of Vil. of Roslyn, 26… [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 11:37 pm
We also talk a bit about the Court of Appeal decision in the case of Spencer v. [read post]
