Search for: "State of Minnesota v. United States"
Results 461 - 480
of 1,647
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2012, 4:59 am
Minnesota v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 6:28 am
But as Target points out, Minnesota has recognized this “separate and distinct” special relationship doctrine, Domagala v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 8:15 am
Texas and United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 8:56 am
Since the United States Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Gideon v. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 8:56 am
Since the United States Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Gideon v. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 8:22 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 11:58 am
United States, No. 07-359. [read post]
16 Nov 2013, 7:59 pm
Alps involved an issue of inequitable conductThis suit was filed by The Ohio Willow Wood Company (“OWW”) against Alps South, LLC (“Alps”) for infringement of United States Patent No. 5,830,237 (the “’237 patent”). [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 12:30 pm
Drew, which considered whether Terms of Service violations trigger CFAA liability, and United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 9:26 am
Part II will analyze the constitutional issues raised by campaign finance regimes that include contribution limitations affecting recall elections, particularly in light of Citizens United v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 3:15 pm
There was a guilty plea today in United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 10:27 am
:Insurrections & Infections: Rethinking the Legal History of Atlanta, 1920-1940 – InmanChair - Robert Baker, Georgia State UniversityPolly Price, Emory University, “Federalization of the Mosquito: Malaria and Public Health In the Southern United States, 1900-1945”Maryan Soliman, University of Pennsylvania, “Racial Equality on Trial in Atlanta during the 1930s”Anders Walker, Saint Louis University, “Scarlett’s Rainbow: Margaret… [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 8:31 am
State v. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 12:32 pm
See Minnesota v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 7:53 pm
Interestingly, in justifying why the Supreme Court should review the denial of the injunction, the States assert that this is a common law case of nuisance between several states (Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania) on one hand, and the United States Army Corps of Engineers and "an instrumentality of Illinois" on the other hand. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Inst. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 7:16 am
Suppose President Obama wins all of the electoral votes from (1) all of the Northeastern states except New Hampshire; (2) Maryland, Delaware, the District of Columbia, and Virginia; (3) all of the states that border on the Pacific Ocean except Alaska; and (4) New Mexico, Colorado, Minnesota, Illinois, and Michigan. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 12:42 pm
And we must; according to the Center for American Women and Politics at Rutgers University, only 107 women hold seats in the United States Congress, comprising just 20% of the 535 members. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 3:26 am
United States v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 6:21 pm
Feb. 9, 2010) (Thrash, J.)Judge Thrash granted the Defendant’s motion to transfer this declaratory action to the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota for consolidation with the Defendant’s first-filed suit for patent infringement. [read post]
