Search for: "State v. Bear King"
Results 461 - 480
of 637
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2011, 11:45 am
The parties might bear in mind the maxim, "if you shoot at the king, don't miss. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 6:00 am
In Precision Contractors Inc. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 10:05 pm
., v. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 2:28 pm
” United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 1:44 pm
Did the State oppose the out-of-time appeal? [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 5:43 am
Adamson had a 1987 Washington D.C. conviction for simple assault and a 1992 Kings County (New York State) conviction for Robbery in the Third Degree. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 12:39 pm
” Pennzoil-Quaker State Co. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 11:39 pm
Religion, Arms, and ResistanceJonathan Mayhew, A Discourse Concerning Unlimited Submission and Non-Resistance to the Higher Powers: With Some Reflections on the Resistance Made to King Charles I and on the Anniversary of his DeathSimeon Howard, A Sermon Preached to the Ancient and Honorable Artillery Company in BostonC. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 3:41 pm
For the one other recent state appellate case recognizing some felons’ right to keep and bear arms, see this discussion of Britt v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 6:00 am
In the case of Haymes Brothers Inc. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 3:06 pm
by Paul Alan LevyRecently I discussed a case in which a web hosting service betrayed its customers by turning over identifying information about Thai emigres who posted criticisms of Thailand’s lèse majesté laws to a web site hosted by that service, who considered that even disputing the laws was an insult to the king. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 10:25 am
State v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 6:22 am
Reed, and Lawrence v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 3:00 am
Sake, Inc., 2011 NY Slip Op 50999(U) (Sup Ct Kings County June 3, 2011). [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 3:49 am
The question presented in State v. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 6:12 pm
The defence filed by Yves Saint Laurent stated:"Red outsoles are commonly used ornamental design feature in footwear, dating as far back as the red shoes worn by King Louis XIV in the 1600s and the ruby red shoes that carried Dorothy home in The Wizard of Oz. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 1:58 pm
Costco’s claim that the first sale doctrine supersedes the exclusive distribution rights followed from the reasoning in the Supreme Court’s decision in Quality King Distributors, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 2:58 am
(3) Does it make a difference to the answer to question 2 above if: (a) as a result of the removal of the boxes (or other outer packaging), the unboxed products do not bear the information required by Article 6(1) of [Directive 76/768], and in particular do not bear a list of ingredients or a “best before date”? [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 3:00 pm
” United States v. [read post]
