Search for: "State v. Burden" Results 461 - 480 of 24,576
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2024, 7:17 am by Russell Knight
Moving to another state clearly does require some kind of action with the court. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 2:26 pm by Eugene Volokh
On a motion by President Shrum, the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma dismissed the suit for lack of standing, ruling that the United States Supreme Court in Summers v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 3:15 am by Meredith Ervine
Our readers know that Delaware forum selection clauses have been enforced by courts in many states since Delaware Chancery’s 2013 decision in Boilermakers v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
These include the following, among other indicators: (i) the acquirer is “well-capitalized” and the resulting institution will be “well-capitalized”; (ii) the acquirer has a Community Reinvestment Act (the “CRA”) rating of Outstanding or Satisfactory; (iii) the resulting institution will have total assets of less than $50 billion; (iv) the acquirer has composite, management and consumer compliance ratings of 1 or 2; and (v) the acquirer has… [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:40 am by Unknown
For inaction on that risk to constitute bad faith, the court stated, the plaintiff would have to plead more that he did.Waste. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 5:27 am by Donald Dinnie
In Eze v Adderley Body Corporate (https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAWCHC/2024/7.html), the court answered this question in the affirmative. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:58 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
 Along with the Supreme Court’s affirmation of the high burden of proof employer must meet to justify refusing to grant religious accommodations to employees in Groff v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 8:39 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
  Given Billings’s 'minimal' burden at this stage, these allegations support a plausible inference of discrimination. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 9:08 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
PRACTICE NOTE: As a case is being worked up for trial, practitioners should keep a list of all potential issues AND what their burden of proof is on each issue. [read post]