Search for: "State v. C. D. H." Results 461 - 480 of 2,117
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2020, 2:29 pm by Giles Peaker
So, a notice under section 8 would fall under section 7 H(W)A. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 12:13 pm by Matthew Kahn
The Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 2:52 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
” See INA § 212(n)(2)(C)(vii)(listing exceptions to the prohibition on unpaid benching) and 20 CFR § 655.731(c)(7)(i) and (ii)(listing, respectively, circumstances where required wages “must” or “need not” be paid). [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 2:52 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
” See INA § 212(n)(2)(C)(vii)(listing exceptions to the prohibition on unpaid benching) and 20 CFR § 655.731(c)(7)(i) and (ii)(listing, respectively, circumstances where required wages “must” or “need not” be paid). [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 5:02 am by Giles Peaker
Mitchell, R (On the Application Of) v London Borough of Islington (2020) EWHC 1478 (Admin) Where a local authority has an initial s.188 Housing Act 1996 duty to provide interim accommodation, but then makes a s.184 decision that the applicant is not in priority need, is that sufficient to bring the s.188 duty to an end? [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am by Schachtman
  AMA Provision H-265.993, concerning “Peer Review of Medical Expert Witness Testimony,” states that:[15] “AMA policy is that: (1) the giving of medico-legal testimony by a physician expert witness be considered the practice of medicine, and (2) all medico-legal expert witness testimony given by a physician should be subject to peer review. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
United States v Meng, 2020 BCSC 785 [82] Ms. [read post]
26 May 2020, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
On the other hand, it is possible that the DST violates both the fundamental freedoms and the state aid rules. [read post]