Search for: "State v. D. A. R."
Results 461 - 480
of 16,107
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2017, 8:52 am
On Thursday, August 3, 2017, the United States Senate, through a deal brokered by leaders McConnell (R-KY) and Schumer (D-NY), voted out dozens of Trump nominees under a unanimous consent agreement. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 1:16 pm
(Canfield v. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 10:24 am
In R (Turley) v LB Wandsworth , the Claimant was the partner of the late Mr Doyle, who was the secure tenant of a property at Battersea Park Rd, London, SW8 from 1995 until his death on 17/3/2012. [read post]
22 Sep 2012, 7:19 am
In Reyes v Jeffcoat, 2012 WL 4009641 (D.S.C.) [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 5:34 pm
The Western Climate Initiative, including California and several Western States, have proposed a greenhouse gas emission reporting rule that would cover the following industries: (A) Adipic acid manufacturing (B) Aluminum production (C) Ammonia manufacturing (D) Cement production (E) Coal mine fugitive emissions (active and abandoned) (F) Cogeneration (G) Electricity generation (H) Electronics Manufacturing (I) Ferroalloy production (J) Glass Production and… [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
And, while Young v. [read post]
19 May 2018, 2:38 pm
Bank N.A. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 9:59 pm
Zmodo moved to dismiss for failure to state a claim under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 9:59 pm
§ 101 By Joseph Herndon -- In the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiff filed a declaratory judgment action on seeking a declaration that none of Plaintiff's accused products infringed any valid claims of Defendant's U.S. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 2:59 pm
Niantic filed the present motion to dismiss the case for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6), on the basis that the asserted patent claims are invalid under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Sep 2006, 4:46 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 6:40 am
In Londano v Gonzalez, 2013 WL 1934043, (D. [read post]
24 May 2010, 8:01 am
But that is what the plaintiff did in H & R Block Eastern Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 2:57 am
Les événements se sont accélérés, donnant à cette thématique une visibilité et une importance sans précédent. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 11:37 am
Further, the decision in R (on the application of S) v YP School (2003) EWCA Civ 1306, (2004) ELR 37 that the appropriate standard in deciding to uphold an exclusion was the criminal one was not robust authority in relation to the requirements of Article 6, and was also inconsistent with House of Lords authority, R(S), B (Children) (Sexual Abuse: Standard of Proof), Re (2008) UKHL 35, (2009) 1 AC 11, and D, Re (2008) UKHL 33, (2008) 1 WLR 1499. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 5:48 am
As Lord Scarman said in R v Home Secretary ex p. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 1:21 pm
Bullock; Dara Lindenbaum; Joseph E Sandler; Lesli D. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 1:21 pm
Bullock; Dara Lindenbaum; Joseph E Sandler; Lesli D. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:59 am
NML Capital Ltd v Republic of Argentina [2011] UKSC 31; [2011] WLR (D) 220 “The Republic of Argentina was not entitled, by virtue of section 31 of the Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982, to state immunity in respect of proceedings brought in England for the enforcement of a judgment obtained in New York. [read post]