Search for: "State v. D. A. R." Results 461 - 480 of 16,107
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2017, 8:52 am by Gene Quinn
On Thursday, August 3, 2017, the United States Senate, through a deal brokered by leaders McConnell (R-KY) and Schumer (D-NY), voted out dozens of Trump nominees under a unanimous consent agreement. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 10:24 am by SJM
In R (Turley) v LB Wandsworth , the Claimant was the partner of the late Mr Doyle, who was the secure tenant of a property at Battersea Park Rd, London, SW8 from 1995 until his death on 17/3/2012. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 5:34 pm
The Western Climate Initiative, including California and several  Western States, have proposed a greenhouse gas emission reporting rule that would cover the following industries:   (A) Adipic acid manufacturing (B) Aluminum production (C) Ammonia manufacturing (D) Cement production (E) Coal mine fugitive emissions (active and abandoned) (F) Cogeneration (G) Electricity generation (H) Electronics Manufacturing (I) Ferroalloy production (J) Glass Production and… [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
Zmodo moved to dismiss for failure to state a claim under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
§ 101 By Joseph Herndon -- In the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiff filed a declaratory judgment action on seeking a declaration that none of Plaintiff's accused products infringed any valid claims of Defendant's U.S. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 2:59 pm by Patent Docs
Niantic filed the present motion to dismiss the case for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6), on the basis that the asserted patent claims are invalid under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
24 May 2010, 8:01 am by Stanley D. Baum
But that is what the plaintiff did in H & R Block Eastern Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 2:57 am
Les événements se sont accélérés, donnant à cette thématique une visibilité et une importance sans précédent. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 11:37 am by Rosalind English
Further, the decision in R (on the application of S) v YP School (2003) EWCA Civ 1306, (2004) ELR 37 that the appropriate standard in deciding to uphold an exclusion was the criminal one was not robust authority in relation to the requirements of Article 6, and was also inconsistent with House of Lords authority, R(S), B (Children) (Sexual Abuse: Standard of Proof), Re (2008) UKHL 35, (2009) 1 AC 11, and D, Re (2008) UKHL 33, (2008) 1 WLR 1499. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 5:48 am
As Lord Scarman said in R v Home Secretary ex p. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 1:21 pm by DMLP Staff
Bullock; Dara Lindenbaum; Joseph E Sandler; Lesli D. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 1:21 pm by DMLP Staff
Bullock; Dara Lindenbaum; Joseph E Sandler; Lesli D. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:59 am by sally
NML Capital Ltd v Republic of Argentina [2011] UKSC 31; [2011] WLR (D) 220 “The Republic of Argentina was not entitled, by virtue of section 31 of the Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982, to state immunity in respect of proceedings brought in England for the enforcement of a judgment obtained in New York. [read post]