Search for: "State v. Daniel B." Results 461 - 480 of 1,162
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2024, 9:47 am by Reference Staff
The legal opinion would become popularly known as The Boldt Decision.The actual title of the case is United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 6:10 am
" The entry ends with this quote from an editorial in the Fort Wayne Journal Gazette:The disagreement is the latest that shows how important it is for legislators and their legal advisers to scrutinize the precise language of the bills they author and shepherd through the legislative process.The entry concluded with this observation from the ILB:This brings to mind a recent Supreme Court ruling (see ILB entry here from June 23rd), Utility Center, Inc., d/b/a Aquasource v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  SeeRestatement (Second) of Torts §134 & comment b (1970).Restatement of TortsThe heeding presumption is derived from language in Restatement (Second) of Torts §402A, comment j (1965) that dealt with the opposite situation − presuming that an adequate warning, when given, will be read and heeded. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 4:22 am by SHG
And so begins its decision in United States v. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 12:05 pm by Law Lady
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT, and STEFFANIE DANIELLE CACCIATORE, Appellees. 4th District. [read post]
21 Nov 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The CBA further provides that the CSEA may request arbitration with respect to a grievance, but no provision in the CBA permits an employee to request arbitration, nor is there a provision that makes the employees a party to the collective bargaining agreement (see generally Matter of Case v Monroe Community Coll., 89 NY2d 438, 442-443 [1997]; Matter of Diaz v Pilgrim State Psychiatric Ctr. of State of N.Y., 62 NY2d 693, 695 [1984]). [read post]
21 Nov 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The CBA further provides that the CSEA may request arbitration with respect to a grievance, but no provision in the CBA permits an employee to request arbitration, nor is there a provision that makes the employees a party to the collective bargaining agreement (see generally Matter of Case v Monroe Community Coll., 89 NY2d 438, 442-443 [1997]; Matter of Diaz v Pilgrim State Psychiatric Ctr. of State of N.Y., 62 NY2d 693, 695 [1984]). [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 6:19 am by Schachtman
Smith cited “the lack of certainty of the pathologic diagnosis of ovarian cancer versus a peritoneal mesothelioma in epidemiologic studies” as making the epidemiology uninterpretable and any conclusions impossible.[14] Against this backdrop of evidence, I took a look at what Johnson & Johnson had to say about the occupational asbestos epidemiology in its briefs, in section “B. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 10:56 am
Today we have a guest post (her second - she's a glutton for punishment) from fellow Reed Smith associate Danielle Devens. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 1:21 pm
  Part II is forthcoming.Plaintiffs Have Another Banner Year in Civil Litigation, Part 1By Daniel E. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 6:45 am by Kiran Bhat
Savage of the Los Angeles Times , Carlos Ball in the Huffington Post, Daniel B. [read post]