Search for: "State v. KAVANAUGH"
Results 461 - 480
of 2,848
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2023, 11:07 am
Delivering a decision in Sackett v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 8:40 am
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit applied the test outlined by Justice Anthony Kennedy in Rapanos v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 7:55 am
I see three key places where this is true (drawn from II, IVA and V of the Gorsuch opinion): The majority agree that the “very core” of the judicial doctrine protecting interstate commerce (called the dormant commerce clause doctrine) consists of cases where the state discriminates against out-of-state competitors of local firms. [read post]
19 May 2023, 4:00 am
(Even Justice Thomas thinks the Constitution limits state protectionist laws, but he would locate protection in the Import/Export Clause of Article I, Sec. 10 and the Privileges and Immunities Clause of Article IV, Sec. 2).In addition, pursuant to Pike v. [read post]
18 May 2023, 9:01 pm
Last week, in National Pork Producers Council (NPPC) v. [read post]
18 May 2023, 8:01 am
United States, as well as a second case, Brown v. [read post]
16 May 2023, 8:53 am
After NPCC v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 12:26 pm
The Supreme Court’s opinion last week in National Pork Producers Council v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 9:59 am
South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP). [read post]
12 May 2023, 2:54 pm
S. 267, 279 (1978), and "try novel social and economic experiments" if they wish, New State Ice Co. v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 11:35 am
The challengers had also made a second argument: Under the Supreme Court’s 1970 decision in Pike v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 9:23 am
The case that came out this morning is National Pork Producers Council v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 9:07 am
Percoco v. [read post]
10 May 2023, 7:48 pm
As they note, there were only six states with bans last year when New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am
Two others Justices, Samuel Alito, and Brett Kavanaugh have called themselves originalists and are receptive to originalist arguments, although seem to be open to arguments that precedent should prevail over original meaning, at least in some categories of cases. [read post]
5 May 2023, 1:42 pm
At least following Bush v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 4:00 am
By Eric SegallTwenty years ago, Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote the following in Grutter v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 5:36 am
In 2015 in Michigan v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 9:01 pm
Wade in Dobbs v. [read post]
1 May 2023, 1:04 pm
Today the Supreme Court decided to hear Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
