Search for: "State v. Micheli" Results 461 - 480 of 1,866
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2017, 7:16 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Mich.): 99 state motion re state prosecutions 115 kb motion for protective order 126 kb motion for summary j re sales and use taxes 143 magistrate order granting protective order [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 12:26 pm by Liisa Speaker
Citing Mayor of Cadillac v Blackburn, 306 Mich App 512, 522; 857 NW2d 529 (2014), the Court of Appeals concluded that because relevant statutes do not state which standard of evidence a Probate Court should require for the removal of a guardian, the default standard of a preponderance of the evidence should be applied. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 11:34 am by Liisa Speaker
The court discussed at length Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States v Hitchcock, 270 Mich 72, 80; 258 NW 214 (1935). [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 9:18 am by Liisa Speaker
Stating that:“A defendant who has entered a plea does not waive his opportunity to attack the voluntary and intelligent character of the plea by arguing that his or her counsel provided ineffective assistance during the plea bargaining process. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:21 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Mich United Conservation Clubs v Anthony, 90 Mich App 99, 109; 280 NW2d 883 (1979) (citations omitted). [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 12:35 pm by Liisa Speaker
’” People v Gioglio, 296 Mich App 12 (2012), quoting Strickland v Washington, 466 US 668, 688, 694; 104 St Ct 2052; 80 L Ed 2d 674 (1984). [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 11:25 am by Liisa Speaker
’ ” Clemons v Detroit Dep’t of Transp, 120 Mich App 363, 364. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 12:44 pm by Liisa Speaker
            Because of these facts, there was proper cause to revisit the original custody arrangement within the definition as set forth in Vodvarka v Grasmeyer, 259 Mich App 499. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 8:30 am by Liisa Speaker
While this is the general rule, Joughin v Joughin, ___ Mich App ___ (2017), Docket 329993, is changing the way this statute of limitations is viewed. [read post]