Search for: "State v. Pass "
Results 461 - 480
of 25,836
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2008, 8:24 pm
The order will remain effective until the state passes a new budget. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 1:01 am
In Fletcher v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 11:55 am
On March 12, 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 8:30 pm
On May 20, 2015, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted final approval of a $1.5 million wage-and-hour class action settlement in Barrera v. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 10:59 am
Dutra v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 12:21 pm
United States – barring police from using a thermal-imaging device to look into a home Florida v. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 9:47 am
More SESTA/FOSTA-Related Posts: * District Court Ruling Highlights Congress’ Hastiness To Pass ‘Worst of Both Worlds FOSTA’– Doe 1 v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 6:37 am
State v. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 7:30 am
See State v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 12:05 pm
On April 18, 2017, the state of Washington passed House Bill 1493 (“HB 1493”), which sets forth requirements for businesses who collect and use biometric identifiers for commercial purposes. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 5:02 am
Meet the New York State Senate. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:57 pm
In Rapanos v United States, the Court rejected what it considered overly broad interpretations of that phrase, noting that under some of the views presented, “waters of the United States” could “engulf entire cities and immense arid wastelands. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 8:04 am
The legislature passes a law that’s likely unconstitutional, but the law doesn’t provide for enforcement by any state actors. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 9:40 am
See, e.g., United States of America v. [read post]
23 Dec 2024, 11:18 am
MEPA, which was based on the federal National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), required environmental assessments and impact statements that considered GHG emissions for these types of projects.1 Then, in 2011, the legislature passed the MEPA Limitation, which was particularly explicit stating that, except for narrowly defined exceptions, “…an environmental review conducted pursuant to subsection (1) may not include a review of actual or potential impacts beyond… [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 6:19 am
In talc exposure litigation of ovarian cancer claims, plaintiffs were struggling to show that cosmetic talc use caused ovarian cancer, despite missteps by the defense.[1] And then lawsuit industrialist Mark Lanier entered the fray and offered a meretriciously beguiling move: Stop trying talc cases and start trying asbestos cases. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 12:01 am
Eugene V. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:48 am
United States, 491 U. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 1:01 am
The Virginia General Assembly has always been a pioneer in passing laws that reflect a concern for “racial integrity. [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 5:25 pm
On 18 June 2014 the Supreme Court handed down judgment in R (T) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] UKSC 35. [read post]
