Search for: "State v. Rios" Results 461 - 480 of 622
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2010, 2:30 am by Kelly
United States (Patently-O) CAFC finds claim construction arguments waived on appeal: Enovsys LLC v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:51 am
(IP finance) The UK IP Office issues a Virgin trademark ruling that contrasts the Israel approach (IP Factor) EWHC (Pat): Article 27 (to prevent parallel proceedings in different member states) requires flexible approach to meaning of ‘same parties’: Mölnlycke Health Care AB (MAB), Mölnlycke Health care Limited (MUK) v. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
All this suggests that providing pseudonymity to members of particular religious groups might violate the principle of the Texas Monthly v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 6:05 am by Katherine Yon Ebright
In a pending case regarding Texas’s authority to construct a 1,000-foot barrier in the Rio Grande, Texas has resurfaced the migration‑as‑invasion theory of the Constitution. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 2:36 pm
Cepeda-Rios, No. 07-50731 An imposition of an eight level sentence enhancement for a guilty plea conviction for illegal re-entry is affirmed where: 1) the enhancement applied because defendant's second conviction for possession of narcotics would have been a felony if prosecuted under the Controlled Substances Act; and 2) defendant's second state conviction for possession had to be treated as an aggravated felony for purposes of his sentence. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 11:57 am by Steven G. Pearl
During the Class Period, Nordstrom paid Putative Class Members' commissions pursuant to a commission plan that it contends was approved by the United States District Court in Rios, and consequently, Nordstrom contends no claim for penalties of any nature is valid. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 1:24 pm
Levando em conta vários estudos é possível começar a perceber como os períodos de guerra e repressão são sempre antecedidos por períodos de enfraquecimento da cultura gilânica. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 6:53 am
Mas, se optarem por continuar, eu acho que quando eles estiverem sofrendo, eles devem procurar ajuda de um psicólogo, ou fazer um exercício ou até mesmo comer vários chocolates. [read post]
10 May 2016, 10:21 am by Kelly Buchanan
The Constitution of 1988 took the morality issue so seriously that, according to article 85(V), the president of the Republic may be criminally charged and lose his/her mandate in case of acts against administrative probity. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 6:11 am
: iLor v Google (ISinIP)   US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Princo - Misuse of a patent pool: En banc Federal Circuit to decide whether CD-R/RW patentees improperly sequestered alternative technologies: Princo Corp v ITC (Patently-O) (Filewrapper)   US Copyright Radio ‘pay to play’ law ready for vote in House, Senate (Ars Technica)   US Copyright – Decisions District Court N D California decision in Louis… [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 5:11 am
: iLor v Google (ISinIP) US Patents - Lawsuits and strategic steps Princo - Misuse of a patent pool: En banc Federal Circuit to decide whether CD-R/RW patentees improperly sequestered alternative technologies: Princo Corp v ITC (Patently-O) (Filewrapper) US Copyright Radio 'pay to play' law ready for vote in House, Senate (Ars Technica) US Copyright - Decisions District Court N D California decision in Louis Vuitton Malletier SA v Arkanoc Solutions, Inc et al -… [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 5:11 am
: iLor v Google (ISinIP) US Patents - Lawsuits and strategic steps Princo - Misuse of a patent pool: En banc Federal Circuit to decide whether CD-R/RW patentees improperly sequestered alternative technologies: Princo Corp v ITC (Patently-O) (Filewrapper) US Copyright Radio 'pay to play' law ready for vote in House, Senate (Ars Technica) US Copyright - Decisions District Court N D California decision in Louis Vuitton Malletier SA v Arkanoc Solutions, Inc et al -… [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
October 2012 (MC)), investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, sued for defamation (For example, see Applause Store Productions Ltd v Raphael [2008] EWHC 1781; Cairns v Modi [2012] EWHC 756 (QB); [2012] EWCA Civ 1382; Tilbrook v Parr [2012] EWHC 1946 (QB). [read post]