Search for: "State v. State Board of Higher Education" Results 461 - 480 of 836
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2016, 9:26 am by Edith Roberts
Coverage continues of pre-election challenges to various state voting law restrictions. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 7:53 am by Roger Clegg
” It is the third and remaining area, higher education, where perhaps the Court now has the most heavy lifting to do. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 12:59 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Florida International University Board of Trustees v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 5:30 am by SHG
At first blush, this would appear to be based upon the Supreme Court’s decision in Davis v. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 12:40 pm by Andrew Hamm
And it will sometimes release the audio sooner than that: since the oral argument in Bush v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
Supreme Court declined to rule on the merits in Zubik v. [read post]
11 May 2016, 6:15 am by scanner1
GOVERNOR STEVE BULLOCK, in his official capacity; ATTORNEY GENERAL TIMOTHY FOX, in his official capacity; MONTANA BOARD OF REGENTS OF HIGHER EDUCATION; COMMISSIONER OF HIGHER EDUCATION CLAYTON CHRISTIAN, in his official capacity; and the STATE OF MONTANA, Defendants and Appellants. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 12:21 pm by Wage & Hour Blogger
  (Again, there is the caveat that public educators should check policies under the state Education Code, and determine if they will affect exemption analysis.) [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 6:03 am by SHG
  It shouldn’t require a federal case to stop the Lhamons from imposing their politics on higher education. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 4:15 am by Howard Friedman
 The statutes generally require approval by the state Board of Higher Education to operate a degree-granting college or grant degrees or certificates of completion. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:24 pm by Howard Knopf
  The Educators had agreed at an early stage of those proceedings to a survey methodology that resulted in evidence that by their later admission “needs to be collected differently” in light of the 2004  CCH v. [read post]