Search for: "THOMAS v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY" Results 461 - 480 of 593
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2020, 4:23 am by Schachtman
A year earlier, in 1989, the New Jersey Supreme Court affirmed a judgment against du Pont in a case brought by employees who established at trial that their employer had intentionally harmed them with respect to their use of asbestos.[3] One of the plaintiffs’ key “state of the art” witnesses throughout the 1980s and 1990s was Gerrit W. [read post]
In turn, these new regulations were challenged by the states of New Jersey and Pennsylvania, which argued that the exemptions exceeded the agencies’ authority under the ACA and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA). [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 9:15 pm by CAPTAIN
Frank Hernandez (open seat)Teretha Thomas Lundy (I) v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 7:36 am by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Numerous other state legislatures, including Missouri’s, New Hampshire’s, and New Jersey’s, recently have considered similar legislation. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 4:50 am by Robin Shea
According to a January 2015 article on the Pew Charitable Trusts website, the following states currently require some form of pregnancy accommodation: Alaska, California, Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Hawaii, Illinois, Louisiana, Maryland, Minnesota, New Jersey, Texas (government employees only), and West Virginia. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At Legal Sports Report, Daniel Wallach explains why he thinks the court will agree to review a cert petition stemming from New Jersey’s attempt to legalize sports betting that asks “whether a federal statute … that prohibits a modification or ‘repeal’ of state law prohibitions on private conduct (i.e., sports betting) impermissibly commandeers the regulatory power of the States, in contravention of the Tenth… [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 12:00 am by Daniel Nazer
As Judge Sidney Thomas explained in dissent: The logical consequence of the majority view is that all realistic depictions of actual persons, no matter how incidental, are protected by a state law right of publicity regardless of the creative context. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 9:05 pm by Alana Bevan
But Justice Clarence Thomas, who authored Brand X, dissented. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 8:50 am by John Elwood
  Petitioners seek review of a decision of the Third Circuit upholding New Jersey’s handgun permit laws, which require an applicant to show a “justifiable need to carry a handgun. [read post]
16 May 2022, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
Recently the editors of the New York Times seriously warned that some states likely would outlaw interracial marriage if Roe v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 2:49 pm by John Elwood
This is something you don’t see often:  the Court rescheduled Thomas v. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 5:30 pm
The district court granted the school's motion for summary judgment stating that it was within the permission scope of New Jersey v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 11:01 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
That concerned Justice Samuel Alito, a former U.S. attorney in New Jersey. [read post]