Search for: "Taylor's Administrator v. Taylor" Results 461 - 480 of 904
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2015, 10:34 am by J
In Sella House Ltd v Mears [1989] 1 EGLR 65, Taylor LJ made clear that it would require “clear and unambiguous” words before a service charge  liability could be imposed on a tenant who was not a party to proceedings. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 6:58 am
  Therefore, it was not obvious to test pregabalin – it might be obvious to test gabapentin, but even here the judge considered that the skilled team would have little expectation of success.InsufficiencyAccording to the caselaw relating to sufficiency developed in MedImmune Ltd v Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd [2011] EWHC 1699 (Pat) at [458]-[484] and summarised in Sandvik Intellectual Property AB v Kennametal UK Ltd [2011] EWHC 3311 (Pat) at… [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
"On another point, the Town contended that Colabella could not “properly raise claims regarding alleged violations of the Taylor Law or as to certain job classification determinations made by the Westchester County Department of Human Resources. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 6:28 pm by Joy Waltemath
Nonetheless, the appeals court determined that the challenge to the department’s general diagnosis provision was properly dismissed because it was neither “intended to reveal” nor “necessitates revealing a disability” (Taylor v. [read post]
  Exemption for Agricultural Activities Presently, 16 states have some sort of exemption for “farm” or “agricultural” labor from workers’ compensation coverage.[1]  The historic reasons for the exemption are couched in administrative ease and economics – that it would be particularly difficult for a small farming operation to maintain the necessary records, insurance and accounting to properly comply with the workers’ compensation system,… [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 8:35 am
Critics such as prominent columnist Stuart Taylor contended that the ruling would have little impact. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
In response to the Greene County Administrator’s denial of the grievance on the grounds that the Civil Service Probationary Rules for Greene Countycontrolled. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In response to the Greene County Administrator’s denial of the grievance on the grounds that the Civil Service Probationary Rules for Greene Countycontrolled. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 7:32 am by John Elwood
The Court summarily reversed in yet another qualified immunity case, Taylor v. [read post]