Search for: "The People v. Officer" Results 461 - 480 of 22,845
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2010, 3:30 pm by Eric E. Johnson
The question is, do these office arrangements cause any regular people on the street to have some inkling of doubt about the independence of the judiciary? [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 10:22 am by Layla Kuhl
In People v Steele, the Court of Appeals reversed the trial court’s suppression of evidence based on the police officer’s investigatory stop of defendant’s vehicle. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 10:57 am
"The same people who do the licensing are the same people who enforce and charge and arrest," she says, noting conservation officers sometimes do things "police officers wouldn't even think of doing. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 9:01 am by Walter Olson
” [Ilya Shapiro and Patrick Moran on Cato cert amicus brief urging the Supreme Court to review Mitchell v. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 1:17 pm
Owens) said there.Anyway, the entire DA's office gets recused, and the Court of Appeal affirms. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 1:19 pm
When a police officer pulled them over after seeing him run a red light, he found Doe injured and bleeding and asked Villa to exit the vehicle. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 11:06 am
But it's an interesting one, if only because few people are aware that parts of the pension dispute involve -- of all things -- claim preclusion and the Contracts Clause.It's also a case worth reading, at least for those down here in San Diego, for the opinion's attitude towards some of the appellant police officers' arguments. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 1:53 pm
  Approximately 4000 yards away from my office at the University of San Diego. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 8:06 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Manitoba Court of Appeal recently released a decision in R v Letkeman, which reviewed the non-custodial sentence imposed on an RCMP officer. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 11:10 am by Law Offices of Rudolph E. Loewenstein
Byrd (People v Byrd, July 29, 2016, D.A.R. 7772), the strict requirements of proof worked to his advantage. [read post]