Search for: "The State Bar Court of the State Bar of California"
Results 461 - 480
of 11,377
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2023, 6:38 am
State Bar of California, 2023 WL 8441781 (9th Cir. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 6:25 am
Some days it seems like everybody in the government – from the lowliest cops to the prosecutors to the public defenders to the state legislators to the governor to the trial judges to the state Supreme Court – is letting us down. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 12:20 am
District Court for the Eastern District of California over allegations that an AI algorithm it uses to screen claims was faulty and that Cigna also denied claims without having a human review them. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm
"For nearly forty years, the California State Bar has enjoyed Eleventh Amendment immunity in federal court," a proposition that the en banc Ninth Circuit reaffirms and terrifyingly supports with a citation to a case decided in 1985. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 3:00 am
Supreme Court. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 12:37 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the sovereign immunity of the California State Bar in litigation brought under the Americans with Disabilities Act. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 8:42 am
Similarly, the State Bar of California released guidelines for the use of generative AI tools as an “interim step” while the technology continues to evolve and improve. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 6:05 am
Whitmer case, the litigation in Michigan contesting the 2020 presidential election results brought on behalf of Republican voters and electoral college nominees; and (3) ensuing discipline, sanctions, and indictments in states from California to New York. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 3:15 am
Some states, like California and Illinois, have only given victims the ability to sue perpetrators for damages in civil court, which New York and Minnesota also allow. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 5:29 pm
Ed. 2d 786 (1982): Sheer incapability or lax enforcement of the laws barring entry into this country, coupled with the failure to establish an effective bar to the employment of undocumented aliens, has resulted in the creation of a substantial “shadow population” of illegal migrants — numbering in the millions — within our borders. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 6:51 am
“California Supreme Court Approves Conflict of Interest Rules for the State Bar of California” — “The California Supreme Court on Tuesday approved three measures to identify and prevent conflicts of interest involving the State Bar of California. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 6:31 am
Voting is now open! [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 11:16 am
” The state can still regulate these activities, but the court says it must do so with a “constitutional scalpel to meet the confines of the Constitution. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 11:03 am
When a seat in the Arizona state Senate became vacant in 1969, O’Connor was appointed to fill it, and was subsequently re-elected to two terms. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 8:31 am
These are therefore not barred. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 7:23 am
One California-based firm, Gibson Dunn, did offer O’Connor a job – as a legal secretary. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 2:51 am
The new guidelines by the State Bar of California aim to navigate these challenges, providing a framework for attorneys to ethically integrate GAI into their practices. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 12:34 pm
For example, last year the Court held that California could forbid the sale of pork produced in a cruel manner. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 6:05 am
When a California statute limiting noncitizen hiring was challenged on federal supremacy grounds in the 1970s, the Supreme Court sided with California, ruling that its statute was permissible absent “any specific indication in either the wording or the legislative history of the [federal Immigration and Nationality Act] that Congress intended to preclude even harmonious state regulation touching on [noncitizens] in general, or the employment of illegal… [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 3:15 am
Consequently, when a different state’s law would govern in the absence of a choice of law provision, and if that state has established legal rules reflecting a different policy toward restrictive covenants than Delaware’s, then this court will defer to that state’s law notwithstanding the presence of a Delaware choice of law provision. [read post]
