Search for: "Thomas v. United States of America" Results 461 - 480 of 967
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am by John Elwood
United States, 15-8629, and Beckles v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 7:44 am by WIMS
<> CERCLA Contribution; The Confusion Continues - In the words of Justice Thomas in United States v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 6:15 am by Eugene Volokh
Raich (2005) (Thomas, J., dissenting) (internal quotation marks omitted); see also United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 1:12 pm by Jeff Gamso
If there's no one, from the Governor to the United States Attorney to the indicted Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to the judges to the lawyers to the citizens, with the guts to take him on, then why waste more time or bandwidth on Joe Arpaio? [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 11:44 am by kwalters
Tying together these contributions is an exploration of the deepened inequities that characterize sexual and reproductive healthcare in the United States. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 5:23 pm by rainey Reitman
  Similarly, the United States Congress is elected by American voters. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 12:26 pm by Marin
”“I was an illegal immigrant in the United States,” Hayek said. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 8:36 am by Kiera Flynn
Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Amicus brief of the Center for Class Action Fairness Amicus brief of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America   Pilgrim Films & Television, Inc. v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 9:14 am by Lyle Denniston
  The issue in Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America v. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 11:20 am by Ronald Collins
With that all said, here are fifteen new or forthcoming works on the Supreme Court:  Erwin Chemerinsky, The Case Against the Supreme Court  Richard Davis, Covering the United States Supreme Court in the Digital Age  Garrett Epps, American Justice 2014: Nine Clashing Visions on the Supreme Court  Lewis L. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 4:27 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks how fully a judge must explain a sentencing modification. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 12:00 am
The good news is that America has fought this battle before in different forms, from Thomas Jefferson’s (unsuccessful) campaign against the First Bank of the United States to the trust-busting of Teddy Roosevelt and the banking regulations of the 1930s enacted under Franklin Delano Roosevelt. [read post]
24 May 2012, 12:56 pm by Eric Turkewitz
For a good read on the long and deep history of such speech in the United States, read the concurring opinion of Justice Clarence Thomas in McIntyre. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 2:29 pm by Mark Walsh
The chief justice says that Justice Neil Gorsuch has the opinion in United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 2:40 am by INFORRM
United States As mentioned above, the US Senate has voted in favour of legislation that could ban TikTok in the country if its Chinese owners refuse to sell. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:38 am by Eric Goldman
Importantly, the Court’s discussion of the source-identifying function of trademarks, repeated emphasis on source confusion as the principal harm in trademark law (see, e.g., the type of confusion “most commonly in trademark law’s sights”, “the bête noire of trademark law”, and the “cardinal sin under the law”), and discussion of the United We Stand America opinion suggests the Justices may like Rogers’ focus on preventing… [read post]