Search for: "Trucks, Inc. v. United States" Results 461 - 480 of 584
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2022, 12:24 am by INFORRM
United States Sarah Palin has lost her libel claim against the New York Times. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 5:40 am by Steven M. Gursten
There have even been some lawsuits, including this one recently filed in United States Eastern District Court, State Farm v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 11:55 am by Christopher Walker
United States, a “clear enough” — as opposed to, perhaps, a crystal clear — Chevron step one inquiry. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 2:46 pm by Patricia Hughes
The Supreme Court of the United States recently stayed injunctions against implementing the rule. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm by Rodger Citron
Administrative Review Board, United States Department of Labor, which became known as “the Case of the Frozen Trucker. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 9:06 am by Charlotte Garden
” The case turned on whether undocumented workers qualify as “employees” under the National Labor Relations Act, an issue that the Supreme Court answered affirmatively in 1984, in Sure-Tan, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 6:25 am
Medico (Filewrapper) BPAI finds claim indefinite and not directed to patentable subject under Bilski: Ex parte Hemmat (GRAY On Claims) District Court N D Illinois: KSR obviousness does not require prior art from the same field: Se-Kure Controls, Inc v Diam USA, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas finds plaintiff has standing; agreement transfers ownership and simultaneously a conditional purchase by transferor from transferee: Balsam… [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 6:15 am by Steven Peck
COLA stated that the matter would be referred to COLA's Contract Fiscal Compliance Unit for a determination. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: US CAFC: Continuation limits invalid; limits on claims and RCEs are ok: Tafas v Doll (Patently-O) (Law360) (Hal Wegner) (IAM) (Patent Baristas) (Promote the Progress) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (IP Spotlight) (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Anticipate This!) [read post]