Search for: "U.S. v. Premises and Real" Results 461 - 480 of 871
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2014, 7:00 am by Bill Marler
As I have told counsel for Primus, in 20 years of litigating every major foodborne illness outbreak in the U.S., my firm has never sued an auditor. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 10:01 pm by Bill Marler
The litigation stems from one of the deadliest foodborne illness outbreaks in U.S. history. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 6:12 am
A regulation of speech is overbroad if constitutionally-protected expression may be `chilled’ by the provision because it facially “prohibits a real and substantial amount of” expression guarded by the 1st Amendment (People v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 5:08 am by Michael M. O'Hear
Randolph, 547 U.S. 103 (2006), which held that officers may not conduct a warrantless consent search of jointly occupied premises if at least one occupant who is present objects. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm by Schachtman
ITERATIVE DISJUNCTIVE SYLLOGISM Basic propositional logic teaches that the disjunctive syllogism (modus tollendo ponens) is a valid argument, in which one of its premises is a disjunction (P v Q), and the other premise is the negation of one of the disjuncts: P v Q ~P­­­_____ ∴ Q See Irving Copi & Carl Cohen Introduction to Logic at 362 (2005). [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 8:45 am
Medtonic, 518 U.S. 470 (1996) and Wyeth v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 4:56 am by Steve Vladeck
Nor is there any real argument that the unsubstantiated fear of such a leak is a proper basis for denying cleared counsel access to material. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 4:00 am by Steve Vladeck
But there is a deep flaw in this very analytical premise. [read post]