Search for: "U.S. v. Under Seal" Results 461 - 480 of 1,390
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2024, 7:30 am by Daniel Spiegel
In Part I of a series of posts on confidential informants, I revisited the landmark case of U.S. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 12:02 am
This contra proferentem rule applies with particular force in cases involving the construction of coverage exclusions, see Seals v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 4:56 am by Edith Roberts
United States ex rel Rigsby, which involves the effect on a lawsuit under the False Claims Act of a violation of the act’s seal requirement. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 7:42 am by Orin Kerr
On the other hand, I was puzzled by the panel’s alternative holding that reached the latter result a second time under the United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 12:29 pm by Brian Clarke
I am currently finishing up a draft of a paper for presentation at SEALS next Monday entitled (rather clunkily I admit): "The Near Term Impact of Judicial Nominations on Court Ideology: A Comparative Study of the U.S. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 12:12 am
Antoine NASSAU COUNTYCivil PracticeRealtor Fails to Show Good Cause Under CPLR §306-b for Extension to Obtain Jurisdiction U.S. 1 Brookville Real Estate Corp. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 6:11 am by Dennis Crouch
  Van Ness argues that the U.S. patent system at the time was being overrun by large numbers of trivial inventions. [read post]
14 May 2012, 12:53 am
Much discussion ensued over the course of the conference about the U.S. doctrine of functionality, and as if on cue, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals (this Kat’s home Court) has given us more wax to chew on on the issue in the case of Maker’s Mark v. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 9:06 pm by Lyle Denniston
Next week, the blog will publish a series of articles — a symposium — on the major immigration case now under review by the Supreme Court: United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 4:50 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Bessemer City, 470 U.S. 564, 574 (1985) (citingUnited States v. [read post]