Search for: "US v. David May"
Results 461 - 480
of 7,398
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm
Last week’s Supreme Court oral argument in Moore v. [read post]
14 May 2023, 12:19 am
David Pollock The death has been announced of David Pollock, former Chair of Humanists UK and a long-standing reader (and friend) of this blog, commentator and occasional contributor. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 6:00 am
In some jurisdictions, including Maryland's federal District Court, this may be an issue of first impression. [1] Maryland's court, however, may have the chance to address the issue if the case Young Again Products, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 2:53 pm
In the Patents Court, England and Wales, Mr Justice Arnold disappointed Mylan by holding the patent to be both valid and infringed [on which, see David Brophy's excellent Katpost here]. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
Robinson, and Arizona v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 1:56 am
Following the judge’s comments, it may be more appropriate for parties seeking information from a third party outside the jurisdiction to look to local law for assistance. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 8:30 am
Representing Appellee PacifiCorp: David G. [read post]
14 May 2021, 7:51 am
In a statement, Commerce and Consumer Affairs Minister David Clark said a Retail Payments Systems Bill would be introduced later this year. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 8:25 am
Readers may also be interested in the so-called SPEECH Act – designed either to prevent libel tourism or to reinforce US exceptionalism (depending on your point of view). [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 8:28 am
Thus, in reaction to Furman v. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 6:59 am
It just may be, if David Kopel at VC is correct when he writes: District of Columbia v. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 10:13 am
But I think the best they had was a non-zero chance of prevailing.Which may be enough, of course, for public interest work. [read post]
19 May 2007, 4:55 am
In Johnson v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
This kind of injury is cognizable and may indeed be ripe (as the Court seemed to suggest in Meese v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 1:43 pm
Supreme Court in AT&T v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 9:13 am
(May 27, 2010)). [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 9:27 am
POHLMAN authored this Opinion, in which JUDGES DAVID N. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
And in Lawrence v. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 9:00 pm
Supremes are reviewing in the pending Moore v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 5:25 am
The plaintiff's lawyer, David Geffen, recently gave us permission to share an amazing story about his oral argument before the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
