Search for: "US v. James Smith"
Results 461 - 480
of 793
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2006, 5:08 pm
Yoder, 406 US. 205 (1972); James D. [read post]
13 May 2012, 2:53 pm
Ward v. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 3:37 pm
ANTOINE SMITH, Appellant, v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 7:56 pm
& Associates, Peter Smith of Law Offices of Peter Smith & Associates, Daniel Nobel, Richard Levit of Levitt & Kaizer(Defendant); Eric Proshansky, Corporation Counsel of the City of New York, Law Department (the City of New York); David Paldy, Department of Taxation and Finance, Office of Tax Enforcement, Special Investigations Unit ( the State of New York); AUSAs James Miskiewicz, John Durham, Diane Leonardo-Beckman.Court Denies Victim’s Request for… [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 10:08 am
The court began by distinguishing a 1968 precedent, Smith v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 11:48 am
Read it here: Colleen V. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a request for an oral hearing… [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a request for an oral hearing… [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 5:03 pm
(NFP) Brian Smith v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 10:56 am
Rosen’s article Katcoff v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
Evans v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 4:09 pm
In Corbyn v Millett [2021] EWCA Civ 657, the Court of Appeal provided useful commentary on the issue of ‘bare comment’. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 3:11 am
At the Dungan Law blog, James Kilbourne reports on legislation in North Carolina intended to respond to the Court’s recent decision in CTS Corp. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 2:11 am
In 1986 the Court held in Bowers v. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 7:59 am
Tony Mauro at the National Law Journal (free registration required) reports this morning that James Feldman, a former Assistant to the Solicitor General who has argued forty-five times before the Supreme Court, will defend Chicago’s strict handgun ban in McDonald v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 12:49 pm
Guest speakers include: Judge James Holderman, Judge Liam O'Grady, Scott Coonan, James Leeds, and many more individuals. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 8:18 pm
” In the last of the four favorable decisions, the Arkansas Supreme Court ordered a new penalty phase proceeding in James Aaron Miller v. [read post]
5 Apr 2014, 11:07 am
Smith Corp., 2006 WL 530388 at *13 (N.D. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 6:27 am
James Beck of Drug and Device Law identifies twenty-two “takeaways” from the opinion. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 9:02 pm
Judge Brinkema rightly rejected this argument, citing the Supreme Court’s 2005 decision in McCreary County v. [read post]
