Search for: "USA v. YORK" Results 461 - 480 of 2,200
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2019, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Harvard Law Review Blog (via How Appealing), Aaron Tang suggests that in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 7:00 am by Andrew Hamm
New York Republican State Committee v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 11:17 am by Eugene Volokh
USA, LLC, No. 17-CV-9215 (LAK), 2019 WL 4464672, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The New York Times (subscription required), Linda Greenhouse writes that “[u]nder the rules that normally govern the American judicial system, the Louisiana abortion law at the center of [June Medical Services v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
” Yesterday, the court issued additional orders from its conference last Friday; the justices denied New York City’s request that New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 1:24 pm by Jennifer Hillman
[v] While this reverse selection process was created in the belief that it would encourage governments to nominate panelists to their own rosters who are independent, objective and well-qualified individuals, instead it has led to significant concerns over and delays in the selection of panelists. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for USA Today, Anita Milanovich argues that in R.G. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 3:38 am by Edith Roberts
” At Take Care, Michele Goodwin weighs in on June Medical Services v. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
” For National Affairs, Joel Alicea and John Ohlendorf write that New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 4:17 pm by Richard Hunt
New York State of Mind I was provided with the relevant papers in Andrews v. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 12:35 pm by Matthew Guariglia
Take Action Tell Congress to End the CDR Program Related Cases: Jewel v. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 4:05 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiff failed to raise an issue of fact in opposition (see generally Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]). [read post]