Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 461 - 480
of 13,828
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2016, 8:57 am
Davis, No. 09-99005 (per curiam; panel is Reinhardt, Wardlaw, and Callahan) --- On remand from the United States Supreme Court, see Davis v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 7:57 pm
NCIS, 3:10-cv-01879-WQH -AJB, pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, sets 9 November as the deadline for the defendants’ answer. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 11:55 am
I will now discuss the Wuhan (Liu Li v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 8:21 am
The United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments Tuesday in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 1:43 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 1:50 am
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California, applying California law, has held that an “insured v. insured” clause exclusion in a D&O policy for claims asserted by an insured against an insured did not preclude the insurer from paying for the entire defense costs incurred by insured and non-insured claimants. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 8:27 am
United Airlines (“Ward”) and Oman v. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm
Draper proposes that the voters of the state adopt a measure that would: (1) “[e]stablish new boundaries for three new states within the boundaries of the [current] State of California; (2) [e]stablish a procedure for the transformation of the single State of California into three new states; and (3) [p]rovide the legislative consent for the formation of three new states to Congress as required by the Constitution of the… [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 5:29 pm
As SCOTUS explains in Plyler v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 11:47 am
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law The United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 11:07 am
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit disagreed, concluding that it was bound by its 2010 decision in United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 6:48 pm
At that time class arbitration waivers were unenforceable under California law, but in a subsequent case the United States Supreme Court held that this California rule was preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA). [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 6:33 am
But the “standing” issue is currently being decided by the United States Supreme Court in another case from California, Toby Douglas v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 4:00 am
Supreme Court invited the Solicitor General to file a brief expressing the views of the United States in Bank of America, N.A. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 4:00 am
Minassian, (CA App., Feb. 17, 2015), a California state appellate court held that Iranian citizens living in the United States should not be required to litigate a dispute with other Iranian citizens over property in Iran in an Iranian court. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 12:11 pm
In a partial victory for California workers, the State's highest court ruled, in Salas v. [read post]
11 May 2018, 4:15 am
Apple smartphone design patent dispute will commence in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California with a retrial to determine a new award in the case. [read post]
14 May 2021, 4:58 pm
Related Cases: United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:16 am
Commentary on the Ninth Circuit (Opinion in Robinson v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 2:18 pm
” Smith relied on an earlier case, United States v. [read post]
