Search for: "United States v. Choice"
Results 461 - 480
of 6,601
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2022, 9:02 pm
If imported to the United States, congressional review would freeze rulemaking for all but the most anodyne texts—even if it could circumvent the holding in INS v. [read post]
17 Oct 2024, 3:18 am
In his famous concurrence in Youngstown Sheet v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 12:00 pm
You’re thinking Citizens United v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 12:32 pm
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (Board) confirmed claims 1–14 of the ’680 patent. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 6:00 am
If we have learned anything from over two hundred years of the common law in the United States, it is that the law is not static and is, in fact, ever changing. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 3:24 pm
United States, which relied on an earlier First Circuit decision (United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2006, 7:13 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 11:58 am
At least when those clauses underlie a foreign judgment that is submitted for recognition in the United States, however, the legislation implementing the Hague Choice of Courts Convention should force some much-needed harmony into the field. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 7:46 pm
” United Farm Workers of Am., AFL-CIO v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 7:00 pm
” United Farm Workers of Am., AFL-CIO v. [read post]
6 Oct 2006, 12:49 pm
What Hernandez actually says is: "[T]he United States Supreme Court has held that denial of this constitutional right is 'subject to a harmless error analysis unless the deprivation, by its very nature, cannot be harmless.' Rushen v. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 10:46 am
Most elders in that situation have no choice but to move to a nursing home (which can cost the state much more than a home care package!!). [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:30 am
Gentry v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 1:54 pm
Filed: November 7, 2013 (unpublished)Opinion by: Judge Andre Davis Held: the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina was not clearly erroneous and did not abuse its discretion in ruling that (1) the parties reached a binding and enforceable oral settlement agreement; and (2) plaintiff did not proceed in bad faith, so neither a dismissal with prejudice nor an award of attorney's fees was appropriate.Facts: Plaintiff made a $12 million… [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 11:28 am
The trial court concluded that the arbitration provision governed the dispute and found venue in the United States wanting. [read post]
23 Nov 2007, 5:25 am
In Crawford v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 9:43 am
United States, No. 17-5639. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 3:00 am
Time will tell.Notes:We covered the Ninth Circuit’s decision in the Hubei v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
Ranked choice voting is his preferred option, but he considers several other schemes as well. [read post]
25 May 2010, 6:46 am
United States v. [read post]
