Search for: "United States v. Choice" Results 461 - 480 of 6,465
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2011, 3:24 pm by Michael O'Hear
United States, which relied on an earlier First Circuit decision (United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 4:53 pm by Native American Rights Fund
S.Res.342: A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that States, cities, Tribal nations, businesses, and institutions of higher education in the United States should work towards achieving the goals of the Paris Agreement. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 4:53 pm by Native American Rights Fund
S.Res.342: A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that States, cities, Tribal nations, businesses, and institutions of higher education in the United States should work towards achieving the goals of the Paris Agreement. [read post]
6 Oct 2006, 12:49 pm
What Hernandez actually says is: "[T]he United States Supreme Court has held that denial of this constitutional right is 'subject to a harmless error analysis unless the deprivation, by its very nature, cannot be harmless.' Rushen v. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 6:00 am
If we have learned anything from over two hundred years of the common law in the United States, it is that the law is not static and is, in fact, ever changing. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 11:58 am by Charles Kotuby
At least when those clauses underlie a foreign judgment that is submitted for recognition in the United States, however, the legislation implementing the Hague Choice of Courts Convention should force some much-needed harmony into the field. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 11:28 am by Mark Murakami
  The trial court concluded that the arbitration provision governed the dispute and found venue in the United States wanting. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 10:46 am by Alexis
 Most elders in that situation have no choice but to move to a nursing home (which can cost the state much more than a home care package!!). [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 12:32 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (Board) confirmed claims 1–14 of the ’680 patent. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
Time will tell.Notes:We covered the Ninth Circuit’s decision in the Hubei v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 1:54 pm
Filed: November 7, 2013 (unpublished)Opinion by: Judge Andre Davis Held: the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina was not clearly erroneous and did not abuse its discretion  in ruling that (1) the parties reached a binding and enforceable oral settlement agreement; and (2) plaintiff did not proceed in bad faith, so neither a dismissal with prejudice nor an award of attorney's fees was appropriate.Facts: Plaintiff made a $12 million… [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Ranked choice voting is his preferred option, but he considers several other schemes as well. [read post]