Search for: "United States v. Grant, III"
Results 461 - 480
of 2,964
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2021, 6:00 am
In particular, the Office invites written comments on three issues: (i) the effectiveness of current protections for press publishers under U.S. law; (ii) whether additional protections for press publishers are desirable and, if so, what the scope of any such protections should be; and (iii) how any new protections for press publishers in the United States would relate to existing rights, exceptions and limitations, and international treaty obligations. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 11:08 am
§ 841(a)(l) as defined in United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 6:51 pm
In addition to requesting a remand under United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
Regarding exhaustion, the court reasoned that because the County’s hearing notice did not provide any notice of the CEQA grounds it would used to comply with CEQA, as stated in Tomlinson v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
Regarding exhaustion, the court reasoned that because the County’s hearing notice did not provide any notice of the CEQA grounds it would used to comply with CEQA, as stated in Tomlinson v. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 1:18 pm
The Supreme Court of the United States made clear in Grady v. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 4:18 am
United States, 393 F.3d 1277 (Fed. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 2:00 pm
United States, 219 U.S. 346, 361 (1911). [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 8:31 am
What the Court said in Galloway v. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 5:00 pm
In the text of EO 14042 (related to COVID-19 mandates), it notes that the order shall not apply to: (i) grants; (ii) contracts, contract-like instruments, or agreements with Indian Tribes under the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (Public Law 93-638), as amended; (iii) contracts or subcontracts whose value is equal to or less than the simplified acquisition threshold, as that term is defined in section 2.101 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation; (iv)… [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 9:13 pm
This argument in United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 12:25 am
Apple complaint is Dallas-based Alston & Bird partner Theodore "Ted" Stevenson, III. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 3:58 pm
When the patent office grants a patent it is not ratifying the applicant’s claim to the grant; iii) The applicant is only required to state whom he believed to the inventor; iv) Arguments as to entitlement to the grant is to be resolved by a separate procedure initiated by the person disputing ownership. i) Does the 1977 Act require that an inventor be a person? [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 9:37 am
The petition for certiorari should thus be granted. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 8:08 pm
The Delaware Supreme Court has announced a revised standard for an important aspect of corporate litigation: the analysis of pre-suit demand futility for purposes of pursuing a derivative stockholder claim, in United Food and Commercial Workers Union and Participating Food Industry Employers Tri-State Pension Fund. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2021, 2:36 pm
See United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 7:27 am
V. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 4:00 am
Additionally, the court referred to a landmark Supreme Court case, Carpenter v United States,[3] and noted that the purpose of the Fourth Amendment was to safeguard privacy and security of individuals against arbitrary invasions by governmental officials. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 1:09 pm
Co. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 2:51 pm
See United States v. [read post]
