Search for: "United States v. House of Representatives of United States"
Results 461 - 480
of 3,985
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2011, 12:01 am
Friedman writes about the state of affairs in eminent domain at the macro level, noting the reactions in state legislatures and the US House of Representatives' current consideration of the "Private Property Rights Protection Act of 2011. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 2:20 am
In a recent judgment the Supreme Court heard a joined case concerning the rights of two EU citizens to claim social assistance in the United Kingdom. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 5:48 am
”In the famous Slaughter-House cases of 1872, the Supreme Court stated that this qualifying phrase was intended to exclude “children of ministers, consuls, and citizens or subjects of foreign States born within the United States. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 4:55 pm
McConnell (who in addition to being a distinguished jurist is also an absolutely first-rate litigator) tries valiantly to make use of an obscure footnote in a 1990 case, United States v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 12:43 pm
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 8:16 pm
Cali)Petition for certiorariBrief of respondent Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives in opposition (forthcoming)Brief of respondent Karen Golinski in support In association with Bloomberg Law [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 12:41 pm
Litigation ensued and the United States Supreme Court ruled in Ayotte v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 8:37 am
House of Representatives passed the “Laken Riley Act”, H.R. 7511 . [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 8:23 am
The following immigration-related bills were introduced into the House of Representatives and the Senate in October - December 2011 and summarized below by AILA (American Immigration Lawyers Association): Senate Bills S. 1856 Introduced by Sen. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 8:19 am
The Supreme Court held that the courts of the United Kingdom do have jurisdiction to judicially review an Order in Council which is made on the advice of the Government of the United Kingdom acting in whole or in part in the interests of the United Kingdom. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 7:39 am
It of course represents only his views, and not the views of his clients or firm.The privilege as applied to in-house attorneysSome in-house attorneys plainly have both legal and non-legal responsibilities. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 10:32 am
(See INS v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 1:00 pm
Curious about the labor movement in Washington State? [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 3:12 pm
However, in Holder v. [read post]
24 May 2022, 2:43 pm
From Cawthorn v. [read post]
19 Jan 2007, 5:19 am
Without this concession, the United States would never be. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 2:14 am
Garland stated that David Weiss would be taking over the case United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 9:42 am
Despite the urging of United States Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Chairman, Christopher Dodd and the House of Representatives Judiciary Committee Chairman, John Conyers, Financial Services Committee Chairman, Barney Frank, as well as several former commissioners of the Securities and Exchange Commission, Paul D. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 12:12 am
Caballes (2005) and United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 7:17 am
As the plaintiffs in BHA v. [read post]
