Search for: "United States v. Newman" Results 461 - 480 of 663
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2012, 10:18 am by Gene Quinn
Federal Circuit: Foreign Application Not Priority in Interference When it Only “Envisions” InventionLast week the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a ruling in Goeddel v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 9:55 am by Geoffrey Rapp
Newman, Note, Raising the bar and the public interest: on prior restraints, “traditional contours,” and constitutionalizing preliminary injunctions in copyright law, 10 VIRGINIA SPORTS & ENTERTAINMENT LAW JOURNAL 323 (2011)Kimberly Nakamaru, Note, Mining for Manny: electronic search and seizure in the aftermath of United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:58 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
United States, which seeks review of an interesting takings case out of the U.S. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 11:40 pm by admin
And then in 1992, Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 1:33 pm by Eric Guttag
Related posts: Bio/Pharma Amici Brief Filed in Marine Polymer Reexam AppealOn September 26, 2011, the a three-judge-panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a ruling in Marine Polymer Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 10:00 pm by Stephanie Figueroa
The Federal Circuit opened the door to them in 1998 when it found in State Street Bank & Trust v. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 10:00 pm by Stephanie Figueroa
The Federal Circuit opened the door to them in 1998 when it found in State Street Bank & Trust v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 3:07 am by New Books Script
K 487 E3 N48 1998 V.3 The new Palgrave dictionary of economics and the law / edited by Peter Newman. [read post]
25 Dec 2011, 1:00 pm
Renee Newman Knake, Michigan State University College of Law, has published Why the Law Needs Music: Revisiting NAACP v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 1:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
In a case of “turnabout is fair play,” last Friday, a United States District Judge for the District of Connecticut considered, and disregarded, the USPTO’s reexamination analysis of the same prior art in Jacobs Vehicle Equipment Co. v. [read post]