Search for: "United States v. North" Results 461 - 480 of 6,006
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2023, 1:20 pm by Joel R. Brandes
  [Canada][Habitual residence] [Petition denied]      In Watson v Watson 2023 WL 1967587 (M.D. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 10:51 am
Like Hugo Gutierrez-Sanchez, who had previously been caught in and removed from the United States twelve times prior to being found in the brush a couple of hundred yards north of the U.S. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 8:29 pm by Lyle Denniston
   Its plea for rehearing came in the Fourth Circuit Court in the case of North Carolina v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 8:13 am by Theodore Harvatin
Recently, the United States Supreme Court held this right to include the right to be free from warrantless blood tests, in Birchfield v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 6:05 am by Joel R. Brandes
His expenses included the costs he incurred in purchasing a visa and passport to travel to the United States ($219.00), a round trip flight from El Salvador ($777.60), a one-way flight to El Salvador for the child ($426.60), and his lodging in North Carolina during the custody exchange of the child ($641.00). [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 9:04 am by admin
Said case is controlling in the states of Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, and West Virginia but can be used as a persuasive authority throughout the United States. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 6:39 am
Before the Supreme Court of the United States went on summer break it announced that it has granted cert in Thompson v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 5:51 pm by Dwight Sullivan
Thanks to a reader who alerted us to this North County Times article reporting that Lawrence Hutchins III of United States v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:16 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Rodriguez Sanchez was not legally in the United States and was not able to return to North Carolina. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 8:15 am
United States of America (The Bahamas) [2007] UKPC 52 (23 July 2007) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 12:51 pm by Theodore Harvatin
North Dakota, which was decided by the United States Supreme Court in 2016, continues to raise questions in courts throughout the country as to how DUI cases can be prosecuted and what evidence can be admitted against defendants charged with DUI. [read post]