Search for: "United States v. Sample" Results 461 - 480 of 1,783
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2009, 8:29 am
Previously, on July 1 of this year, I blogged about a case that was handed down by the United States Supreme Court earlier this year. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 9:06 pm by Dan Flynn
AUSTIN — It was a long but primarily quiet Monday as a 12-man, four-woman jury was selected to hear the United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 11:24 am by Steven Cohen
Midsun Group, Inc – United States District Court – District of Connecticut – December 7th, 2017) involves a claim of trademark infringement. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:04 am
Interflora British Unit v Marks and Spencer PLC Flowers Direct Online Limited [2009] EWHC 1095 (Ch). [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 8:35 am by Matthew Dochnal
The United States Chamber of Commerce has consistently rated Delaware’s legal system as number one year after year. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 11:27 am by Shea Denning
The North Carolina Court of Appeals decided a significant case yesterday, ruling in State v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 11:27 am by Shea Denning
The North Carolina Court of Appeals decided a significant case yesterday, ruling in State v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 1:36 am by Patrick Goold
This work concludes that the current structure of author termination rights in the United States is at odds with its political justification, as well as the utilitarian purpose of copyright law. [read post]
So while patients in the United States have access to testing for Long QT Syndrome through six laboratories in the wake of the Supreme Court decision, Canadians must send samples to the United States to be tested, at a cost of more than $4,000 per test. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 1:39 pm by Saira Hussain
It draws its authority from the DNA Fingerprint Act of 2005, which granted the Attorney General power to direct federal agencies to collect DNA from “individuals who are arrested, facing charges, or convicted or from non-United States persons who are detained under the authority of the United States. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 12:12 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
United States, 351 F.3d 1374, 1378 (Fed. [read post]