Search for: "United States v. Steven Stands"
Results 461 - 480
of 844
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2013, 1:35 am
Chamber of Commerce of the United States and the National Association of Manufacturers filed an amicus brief in support of the company’s petition. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 6:23 am
” Finally, at the Ogletree Deakins blog, Vicki Nielsen and Hera Arsen summarize United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 4:11 am
Third, Steve asserts that the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces’ decision in United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
Although it was the product of a 2-1 split decision, the ruling in United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2013, 1:57 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
Despite the turmoil surround software patent eligibility I believe with great certainty that software will remain patent eligible in the United States. [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
He ordered Verizon to turn over “telephony metadata”—essentially call logs—of all calls in which at least one party was in the United States; and he forbade Verizon from informing its customers that their phone activity (though not the content of their conversations) would be shared with the government in this way. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 8:34 am
Phelps, and United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
In United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 8:08 am
Briefly: At PrawfsBlawg, Will Baude covers United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 1:34 pm
” Steven [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 7:06 am
CJEU reasoning in Usedsoft v Oracle http://bit.ly/13zsrq5 Monsanto Wins Again in Federal Circuit: Organic Farmers Have No Standing to Challenge Patent http://bit.ly/13zsfqL A majority of Americans find government&rsqu [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 9:00 pm
United States does not deal with sex offenders, its impact will surely be felt in the sex-offender cases. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
United States, 597 F. [read post]
14 May 2013, 7:19 am
United States, a challenge to the constitutionality of court-martial jurisdiction over a civilian contractor. [read post]
5 May 2013, 12:15 pm
Sanders argues that the Milward opinion is important because it highlights what he characterizes as a “rhetorical conflict that has been ongoing, often below the surface, since the United States Supreme Court’s 1993 opinion in Daubert v. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 12:09 pm
Supp. 2d 348 (S.D.N.Y. 1998); Bryant v. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 7:30 am
United States. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 9:04 am
Two years ago, the United States Supreme Court issued a ruling in the case of Pliva v. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 7:26 pm
He described the circuit split leading to FTC v Actavis currently pending in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
