Search for: "United States v. Tam"
Results 461 - 480
of 917
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2012, 7:53 am
The lawsuit, United States of America ex rel. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 4:13 pm
United States Patent & Trademark Office v. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 3:01 am
Belmora says that one need not own a trademark in the United States to bring a Section 43(a) claim (Bayer owned the mark FLANAX in Mexico). [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 12:38 pm
While the qui tam action was pending, CTI sued Lash in state court on several grounds. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 11:15 am
On September 28, 2010, the Supreme Court of the United States granted certiorari in Schindler Elevator Corp. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 9:56 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:47 pm
Iancu v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:47 pm
Iancu v. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 10:12 am
In Tolliver Group, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 3:54 am
United States, which asks whether the residual clause of the sentencing guidelines is unconstitutionally vague. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 2:20 pm
ACMA’s lawsuit seeks to overturn FTB Technical Advice Memorandum (TAM) 2022-01 and amendments to FTB Publication 1050 on the basis the administrative guidance contradicts PL 86-272 and the United States Constitution. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 9:40 am
Tam (2017) and Iancu v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 11:56 am
In United States ex rel. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 10:01 am
On appeal to the Federal Circuit, the defendant "asserts that, as drafted, 35 U.S.C. 292(b) violates the 'Take Care' and 'Appointments' clauses of Article II of the United States Constitution as it fails to provide for the necessary supervision of the qui tam litigant who is purporting to enforce a criminal statue on behalf of the government. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 6:00 am
That case, Matal v. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 2:22 pm
Madison) or whether the President’s claim of Executive Privilege was correct (United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 2:07 pm
James Landolt v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:12 am
On September 8, 2011, members of the United States Congress passed the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (H.R. 1249) with a vote of 88-9, without amendment to the House bill passed in late June. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 2:41 pm
In a groundbreaking case of first impression, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit decided Hooper v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 2:45 pm
United States, 714 F.3d 1311,1315 (Fed. [read post]
