Search for: "Unknown Persons or Claimants" Results 461 - 480 of 562
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2011, 3:22 pm by Sean Wajert
Tolling individual  actions based on a pending personal injury class action renders limitations periods impermissibly uncertain and invites unnecessary litigation by giving plaintiffs’ counsel everywhere an incentive to add putative class relief to every federal complaint just to toll statutes of limitations to the benefit of unknown future plaintiffs -- knowing there will never be a certified class. [read post]
21 May 2011, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
  It is curious that the Report contains no discussion of the two first instance cases where the court has considered the point and has held that this was not necessary (WER v REW [2009] EMLR 304; TUV v Persons Unknown [2010] EWHC 853 (QB)). [read post]
19 May 2011, 2:42 pm by NL
And on one of the great unknowns of disrepair liability to boot! [read post]
9 May 2011, 8:04 am by INFORRM
He argues that the problem is for the person who took out the injunction and the person who breaks it. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 10:40 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
In appropriate circumstances this includes consideration of the Article 10 rights of anyone, party or not, who would be restrained from publishing the specified category of information (X v Persons Unknown [2009] EMLR 290). [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 5:18 pm by INFORRM
In appropriate circumstances this includes consideration of the Article 10 rights of anyone, party or not, who would be restrained from publishing the specified category of information (X v Persons Unknown [2009] EMLR 290). [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 9:57 am by J
The claimants sued the defendant under s.1, 1972 Act. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 9:57 am by J
The claimants sued the defendant under s.1, 1972 Act. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am by Bexis
  Most of them include remedies, such as double or treble damages and recovery of attorneys’ fees, that are unknown and antithetical to personal injury jurisprudence.So even assuming – which we emphatically don’t – that consumer fraud claims have any place in any sort of product liability litigation, their assertion by personal injury plaintiffs is simply out of bounds.And that’s what the court held in Birdsong, squashing the claim like a… [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 5:53 pm by INFORRM
  These were, again in reverse chronological order, as follows: CBL v Person Unknown or Persons Unknown, (29 March 2011), Sharp J. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 7:02 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Traditional problem: no author on whom to hang ownership. 1967 revision tried to recognize that this would be conferring a copyright on people who were unknown. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:13 am by INFORRM
The claimant sued after the council sent an email to a number of people, informing them that her name had been put onto its “violent persons register”. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 5:19 am by INFORRM
However, it was against persons unknown, which became “a bit of a trait” because it meant no one was there to argue the other side. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 11:44 am by Medicare Set Aside Services
This is a much needed solution to some mass tort situations where the insurance payment will be made into a fund that will payout claims to claimants unknown at the time of settlement. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 9:15 am by Schachtman
  Without something more, the actual result of the throw would still be utterly unknown. [read post]