Search for: "W. T. Grant Company, in the Matter of" Results 461 - 480 of 936
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Sep 2019, 1:52 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Peloton responded by rejecting Move Press’s claims and concluded by stating “[w]e trust that this resolves the matter; however, if you have questions, please contact the undersigned. [read post]
28 May 2010, 1:19 pm
Dow Jones & Company, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
In a direct listing, however, the company does not typically issue new shares. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 12:12 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
After the jury’s verdict of infringement and its award of damages, he district court granted Teva’s renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law of noninfringement. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 12:13 am
Madden testified that when Templin asked him why he had set off the firecrackers, he responded, "Didn't you see that dog come up? [read post]
Our comments proceed as follows: First, we describe the history of SEC rules in this area, explaining that the SEC has long mandated public-company disclosure of environmental-related matters. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 10:50 am by Bexis
Nixon situation, there’s no such thing as a “sure” Supreme grant, when a circuit split is combined with an “important” (see Rule 10(a)) issue like preemption, a grant of review is often the result. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
At The National Law Journal (subscription or registration required), Tony Mauro reports that “[w]ithout explanation, the U.S. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 10:15 am by Kevin Whitaker
I don't agree that your privacy rights only matter when someone uses it to your proven detriment, to me, one's privacy rights are harmed when someone invades it and takes it, regardless of what they do with it. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 10:06 am by Neil Rosenbaum
The district court granted that motion, and then dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because, stripped of class allegations, the named plaintiffs’ own claims fell short of amount-in-controversy requirements for federal jurisdiction. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 9:52 am by Alan Z. Rozenshtein
It’s been called “legally bonkers,” a “troll to get SCOTUS to grant cert,” an “angrily incoherent First Amendment decision,” and “the single dumbest court ruling I’ve seen in a long, long time. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 2:33 pm by Tonya Gisselberg
  Louis Vuitton cross-appealed the district court’s order granting MSG’s motion for judgment as a matter of law. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 2:57 am by Marie Louise
Pfizer Ltd (Kluwer Patent Blog) Boniva (Ibandronate) – US: Roche dodges Cobalt invalidity contention in Boniva patent suit (Patent Docs) Boniva (Ibandronate) – US: Hoffman-La Roche files patent infringement suit against Mutual Pharmaceutical Company following Para IV certification filing (Patent Docs) Botox (Botulinum) – EU: General Court confirms declarations of invalidity of BOTOLIST and BOTOCYL filed by Allergan: T-345/08 and T-357-08 (Class 46) Detrol… [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 3:12 pm by Lauren Bateman
The prosecutor moves to the matter of timing: if Judge Spath were to grant such a hearing, the government requests that the parties be given 45 days of notice, as opposed to the defense’s request of 120 days. [read post]