Search for: "Wal-Mart Inc. Stores" Results 461 - 480 of 1,976
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2015, 8:27 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
Wal-Mart PR is ultimately owned by Wal-Mart Stores Inc., a Delaware corporation headquartered in Bentonville, Arkansas. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 1:14 pm by Charles Casper
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 725 F.3d 349, 355 (3d Cir. 2013), and Carrera, the Third Circuit established a two-part test for ascertainability: (1) the class must be defined with reference to objective criteria, and (2) there must be a reliable and administratively feasible mechanism for determining whether putative class members fall within the class definition. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 1:14 pm by Charles Casper
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 725 F.3d 349, 355 (3d Cir. 2013), and Carrera, the Third Circuit established a two-part test for ascertainability: (1) the class must be defined with reference to objective criteria, and (2) there must be a reliable and administratively feasible mechanism for determining whether putative class members fall within the class definition. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 6:52 am by Joy Waltemath
Specifically, she purported to certify the class under Rule 23(b)(2), even though the Supreme Court made clear in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 7:30 am by Steven Cohen
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP et al – United Sates District Court – Southern District of Alabama – November 12th, 2015 – This case involves a slip & fall out side of a Walmart. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 6:54 am by Robert Kreisman
Frank Barnai, as Assignee of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and International Contractors, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 6:00 am by Martha Engel
”  And, all four of the applications were filed by Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 7:27 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
On appeal, Tyson Foods argued that plaintiffs’ use of averaging constituted impermissible “trial by formula” under Wal-Mart Stores Inc. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 10:48 am by Lyle Denniston
The Justices’ criticism of “trial by formula” came four years ago in Wal-Mart Stores v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 9:33 pm by Lyle Denniston
 (The Wal-Mart cases apparently are being held for the ruling in the Tyson case.) [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 8:13 am by Joy Waltemath
Turning to DSW’s argument that the employee failed to mitigate damages, the court found that she put forth compelling facts tending to show that she conducted a thorough job search from 2009 through 2012, worked at Wal-Mart at a lower paying job for a while, and again conducted a thorough job search after she left Wal-Mart. [read post]