Search for: "Weinstein v Weinstein"
Results 461 - 480
of 857
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2014, 8:04 am
The case of Conrad v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 1:11 pm
The case is TPG Arrow Productions, Ltd. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 11:37 am
Weinstein Co., LLC (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 6:23 am
Pinkney v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 6:00 pm
In the case of Melgar v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 5:21 am
The problem is he doesn't care.Recently he accused federal prosecutors of being extortionists because they do what the Supreme Court explicitly authorized them to do, to wit, offer sentencing inducements in order to settle cases by plea bargains, Bordenkircher v. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 8:31 am
From People v. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 6:41 am
The recent issue of Environmental Health Perspectives contains several interesting articles on scientific methodology of interest to lawyers who litigate claimed health effects.[1] The issue also contains a commentary that argues for greater transparency in science and science policy, which should be a good thing, but yet the commentary has the potential to obscure and confuse. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 2:07 pm
Reed v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 9:23 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Contract Law Opinions Body: AC35656 - Weinstein & Wisser v. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 10:36 am
See also El v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 9:45 am
In Perez v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 9:45 am
In Perez v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 5:32 pm
– McLean, VA lawyer Mark Dombroff of McKenna Long & Aldridge on the firm’s blog, Plane-ly Spoken Supreme Court rules induced infringement requires a 271(a) direct infringer (Limelight v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 6:51 pm
Kava v. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 7:38 am
Last month, Judge William Hillman of the Boston Bankruptcy Court, in In re Maria A. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 4:55 am
See U.S. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 9:06 am
Matt Danzer pored through the transcripts of yesterday’s military commissions motions hearing in U.S. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 5:37 am
Pointing to the nature of a small family-run business and the natural concern for the success of a family member, a federal district court in New York concluded that even though the alleged harasser was not the employee’s supervisor, a jury could find the requisite supervisory authority for vicarious liability under Vance v Ball State Univ. based on his influence over his stepson and wife, who was also a manager (Dillon v NED Management, Inc, February 11, 2014,… [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 12:25 pm
Weinstein v. [read post]
