Search for: "White v. Boston" Results 461 - 480 of 614
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
: (Spicy IP),USD 20 billion going off-patent: (Patent Circle),Canadian Prices Review Board asserts jurisdiction over products sold in US, but imported into Canada under Special Access Program: (Gowlings),Canadian Court of Appeal affirms decision allowing patent-owner to be joined to proceedings: Cobalt v Pfizer and Pharmascience v Pfizer: (Gowlings),PharmaStem appeals stem cell patent: asks for greater deference to patent examiners:… [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 5:21 am
This contribution has been made more interesting by the distribution (in English) of the State Council's White Paper:  China: Democracy That Works on 4 December 2021 (original:  中国的民主 also distributed on 4 December) and its companion White Paper "The State of Democracy in the United States"  (5 December 2021; Official English translation HERE); [美国民主情况] (original Chinese… [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 12:42 pm by admin
  Detroit was the scene for a landmark eminent-domain case, Poletown v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
If you just blithely ignore it, and publish the story despite having been told that it may well be mistaken, that would be textbook "reckless disregard," which would allow liability even in a public official case: Consider, for instance, Harte-Hanks Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 8:03 am
– Brdo: (IPR-Helpdesk), 9-12 June: (US) Strategies for management of IP – Chicago: (IPR-Helpdesk), 16 June / 1 July:US PLI: ‘Prior art & obviousness 2008: The PTO and CAFC perspective on patent law sections 102 & 103’ - San Francisco / New York: (Patent Docs), 17-20 June: US BIO international convention – San Diego: (Patent Docs), 18-20 June / 9-11 July: US PLI: ‘Fundamentals of patent prosecution 2008: A… [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 12:43 pm
Marys, Tarboro, Waverly, White Oak, and Woodbine. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 6:00 am by Quinta Jurecic
Interestingly, proponents of a vote regularly pointed to senators’ oaths: “The senators swore their oath to the Constitution,” Martha Minow and Deanell Tacha argued in the Boston Globe. [read post]